Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Now Recognizes Same-Sex Marriage in 33 States, Including DC
Christian Post ^ | 10/27/2014 | Anugrah Kumar

Posted on 10/27/2014 7:36:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

As same-sex marriage became legal in Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, North Carolina, West Virginia and Wyoming recently, the federal government now recognizes gay married couples in 33 states, including the District of Columbia, according to Attorney General Eric Holder.

"With each new state where same-sex marriages are legally recognized, our nation moves closer to achieving full equality for all Americans," The Associated Press quoted Holder as saying.

Holder's announcement means married same-sex couples in 33 states will qualify for federal benefits, including Social Security and veterans' benefits.

"We are acting as quickly as possible with agencies throughout the government to ensure that same-sex married couples in these states receive the fullest array of benefits allowable under federal law," Holder added.

Holder's statement comes after the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to hear appeals from five states that wanted to retain their bans on gay marriage.

The attorney general added that same-sex marriages performed in Indiana and Wisconsin in June will also be recognized, according to USA Today.

About a week ago, the Supreme Court rejected a last-minute plea by Alaska, which had asked for more time to file more detailed appeals to use its sovereign power to define marriage, to block a federal court ruling striking down the state's ban on gay marriage.

Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell's office said the state would resume issuing marriage licenses the following week even as it goes forward with a last-ditch legal appeal.

In Arizona, U.S. District Judge John Sedwick also ruled that the state's restrictions on same-sex marriage were "unconstitutional by virtue of the fact that they deny same-sex couples the equal protection of the law."

Arizona's attorney general Tom Horne said there was no point in appealing the ruling, and gave the go-ahead for marriages to proceed.

In Wyoming, federal judge Scott Skavdahl struck down the state's ban on same-sex marriage and put his own ruling on hold until last Thursday or until state officials declare that they will not appeal.

Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead said the ruling was against his personal beliefs but the state would not appeal because it would likely not succeed.

Federal judges started striking down state amendments and laws banning same-sex marriage as unconstitutional after the Supreme Court last June squashed a key part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexuality; romneymarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: mrsmel

Anytime the courts have to force something on all the states which is what is coming its not accepted.


21 posted on 10/27/2014 8:17:36 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego; All

The “”War on Churchs”” is coming, folks. They will sue churches into insolvency, as the churches try to defend themselves.


22 posted on 10/27/2014 8:18:29 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens. KILL THE BILL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sickening. An embarrassment to our country.


23 posted on 10/27/2014 8:57:20 AM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Liberals will never be happy about anything.


24 posted on 10/27/2014 9:14:30 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RBW in PA

Yep. Majority of the population does not support it nearly anywhere. But the dictators in black robes have spoken.


25 posted on 10/27/2014 9:18:40 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Or the very least, in the same way we've "accepted" abortion.

"I don't like it, but oh, well, the Supreme Court says it's the Law of the Land. Watcha gonna do?"


26 posted on 10/27/2014 9:39:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

And like abortion this will grow to be a great American nightmare, God has been taken out of all equations, the price will be severe and sudden, the heart of man is desperately wicked, especially so when the wisdom of God is ignored.


27 posted on 10/27/2014 10:09:38 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We also recognize unicorns in all 50 states, but that doesn't make unicorns real. The courts may force us to give legal status to gay "marriage", but that doesn't make it any more real as a form of marriage than unicorns are as a type of animal. We're just playing pretend until sanity breaks out again.

28 posted on 10/27/2014 11:18:34 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

RE: We also recognize unicorns in all 50 states, but that doesn’t make unicorns real.

The only problem with that analogy is UNICORNS DON’T SUE. Gays do when you don’t perform or service their “marriage”.


29 posted on 10/27/2014 11:21:56 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: publius911
"So what? I will never recognize that "marriage."

My thoughts exactly.

30 posted on 10/27/2014 11:22:58 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The title is actually false.

It should read “Activist U.S. courts demand recognition of “same-sex” marriage in 33 States”; because, left to many of those 33 states and their people, no such “recognition” would be given by the state.


31 posted on 10/27/2014 3:39:23 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson