[reaganaut1]

"But critics, noting the racial imbalances in how some crimes are processed, have argued that asking it can amount to a form of unintended discrimination."

So you can't prefer law-abiding applicants over criminals because a higher fraction of blacks than whites have criminal records. Ever get the feeling you are living in an insane asylum?

[Genoa]

Should be limited to conviction. Arrest does not establish guilt.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

I agree with this.

They should shorten the question.

It should ask if you have ever been convicted of any felony. Just being arrested is not a crime.

[Pearls Before Swine]

“Have you ever been convicted of felonious sexual assault?”

Well, if so, we don’t care, because our policy requires you and your “dates” to sign consent forms. Everything’s cool

[2ndDivisionVet]

So they’re going to quit harassing George Zimmerman now, since he was never convicted of a crime? I didn’t think so...

[Da Coyote]

Heck, no new news there.

Harvard let the Obamadork/felon/cretin into their law school.

So much for their “process”.

[Iron Munro]

To liberals criminals aren’t criminals.

They’re just nice people with alternate belief systems.

/s

[SECURE AMERICA]

So for some perceived nonsensical PC charge of discrimination we will allow rapist and sexual offenders on to the college campus?