Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
if you squint just a little.

I don't squint.

Public health has always been in the power of the States.

The Feds have NOTHING to do with health.

It's a State police power, and as such, the feds have NO say.

/johnny

28 posted on 10/26/2014 2:50:15 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper

No but the feds control international commerce and travel. Therefore I agree that anything on the scale of a potential pandemic is in the realm of the feds. You think for one second the differing viewpoints of various states could coordinate a unified and exact set of rules with respect to containing a potential pandemic? Good luck on that. Let me know how that exactly works out between the state’s of California and Texas


32 posted on 10/26/2014 2:58:22 PM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

From a strictly constitutional perspective, you may be right. In the America we live in, which is one of rapid transit, public health policies differing by State will be utterly ineffective at stopping an actual pandemic.

To be sure, the feds have to date given no evidence they’re any more capable of stopping a pandemic, but at least it’s theoretically possible for them to do so.

So in the final analysis it gets down to the old saw about whether adherence to the Constitution requires the country to commit suicide. Or to the words of Jesus about whether the Sabbath was created for man, or man for the Sabbath.


35 posted on 10/26/2014 3:02:30 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson