[GOPJ]

“I don’t expect the Times to reflect my worldview, exactly,” Dreher wrote in explaining his decision to cancel his subscription, “but I will not subsidize journalism put out by journalists who want to ‘stamp out, ruthlessly’ the religious convictions of people like me.”

Not only is the Times biased and hateful, but they subtly advocate violence against conservatives.

[kitkat]

BTTT

[Hostage]

> “It may be true that the Times should diversify its staff on racial grounds. But there is another area in which the Times is sorely in need of diversification: its coverage of religious and social conservatives.”

Never happen. Homosexuals make up 3/4’s of the Times editorial staff.

[Bullish]

Anyone who would ever believe a “newspaper” full of liberals could ever be fair and balanced would also believe a frog could hop over the Atlantic.

[x]

But shouldn’t diversity include political and ideological diversity too?

Not gonna happen. The paper is never going to have a mass audience, whatever it does. It's going to remain a liberal niche product until it finally folds.

[tomkat]

Given the level of communist infiltration/subversion of our institutions that McCarthy tried to raise the alarm about in the 50s,
coupled with the daily tax rape of the average working citizen by a Leviathan fedgov, a parasitic EBT underclass of multi-generational longevity, and the repulsive political vermin who whore their votes to appease and maintain it,
anyone still thinking that our Constitutional Republic has a chance of being restored short of another Civil War is, quite frankly, delusional.