Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exposed: Dem Candidate's Misleading Statements on Spending, Borrowing for AZ Universities
Townhall.com ^ | October 24, 2014 | Ky Sisson

Posted on 10/25/2014 5:34:01 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Democratic candidate in the Arizona gubernatorial race, Fred DuVal, is having a rough final stretch into Election Day. Earlier this week, The Washington Free-Beacon reported he had a house foreclosed. Last week, he announced that he believes it is perfectly acceptable for 14-year-olds to have abortions without parental consent. 

And now, documents obtained from the Arizona Board of Regents show that the six years Fred DuVal was on the Arizona Board of Regents (2007-2012), things didn't go the way he claims.

In three different instances, DuVal said that the increase in Arizona college tuition was because of higher enrollment and budget cuts. The Arizona Board of Regent's records on budget and spending tell a different story.

DuVal claimed during a 12 News Debate that "record levels of new enrollment" and budget cuts were the sole reasons for tuition increases.  

These tuition increases for Arizona public universities were no small amount. 

Arizona State University's residential tuition rates doubled, a 107 percent increase from $4,700 to $9,700. Northern Arizona University and the University of Arizona also saw over 100 percent increases during DuVal's time on the board.

In one of his YouTube videos and in an interview with The Arizona Republic, DuVal blamed current Arizona governor, Jan Brewer, and the state legislature for cutting $400 million from universities forcing the cost onto students.

Yes, DuVal was correct when he said enrollment was higher. The total number of students at Arizona universities rose 16.6 percent over his six years. But higher enrollment can't be blamed for such drastic increases...Liberal spending played the lead role

When DuVal joined the ABOR, the state appropriated $860 million in general funds for the universities. Collective spending during the six years DuVal was on the board was up $300.8 million. Five of the six years DuVal oversaw spending for Arizona's universities, spending was higher than the first year he was appointed to the Board of Regents.  

Items in yellow represent the fiscal years that DuVal oversaw:

And when money is spent recklessly, borrowing is usually reckless as well. 

There was a 286 percent increase in borrowing during DuVal's time on the board.

During DuVal's time, the state issued $1.463 billion in bonds. Compared to the previous six years prior to DuVal, the ABOR only requested and had approved $409.5 million in bonds.

Education has been one of the defying issues facing Arizonans this election season and this new information on Fred DuVal and his time on the ABOR could swing voters.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: election2014; fredduval; gubernatorial

1 posted on 10/25/2014 5:34:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Democrats are saturating my congressional district with ads saying that the Republican candidate (John Katko) wants to make it illegal for women to obtain any form of birth control.

The name of the Democrat incumbent (Dan Maffei) doesn’t appear anywhere in the ads.


2 posted on 10/25/2014 5:43:55 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

They are doing the same in Tucson about McSally. The ads are outright lies or distortions but are attributed to some amorphous democrat agency. Barber, Pelosie and Reid are behind them but they are not mentioned.


3 posted on 10/25/2014 6:59:42 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

DuVal wants 14 year olds to have abortions? Does that means he approves underage sex and/or pedophilia?


4 posted on 10/25/2014 7:24:12 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

This ‘right to murder’ is a biggie this election. I know where I work, women crazy over this, it’s their only issue. Guess we lost the big picture somewhere along the line, let the Dems control the conversation for way too long.


5 posted on 10/25/2014 7:51:10 AM PDT by Kenny (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Negative ads are awful when Republicans use them, and the talking heads never tire of decrying them, and explaining that voters are turned off by them and will be driven to vote Democrat as a result.

When Democrats use them against Republicans, the MSM averts its eyes.


6 posted on 10/25/2014 7:54:31 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExCTCitizen

Most likely


7 posted on 10/25/2014 8:25:52 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson