Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomPoster
A good friend who is a practicing MD and retired military said the same thing to me.

Well, its true, it will spread in South America almost as rapidly as it has spread in Africa.

Our southern border is wide open, and thousands of South Americans are already streaming across. An ebola outbreak in South America will only increase that flow, as healthy people move away from the outbreak and as sick people come to America for free health care.

After that, it's just dominos. Our health care infrastructure will eventualty be overwhelmed by actual and suspected cases of ebola.

Once there is a significant outbreak in SOuth America, it's only a matter of time.
15 posted on 10/24/2014 8:47:42 AM PDT by caligatrux (They always said that the living would envy the dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: caligatrux
South America

Central America.

20 posted on 10/24/2014 9:40:40 AM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: caligatrux; Rummyfan; FreedomPoster

The world is, largely, in denial. Read these 2 articles to understand why:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/six-reasons-panic_816387.html#!

http://raconteurreport.blogspot.com/2014/10/another-nail-in-coffin-expecting.html

Both explain the mathematics of the thing. Put simply, Ebola is expanding at a geometric rate (doubling roughly every 3 weeks), while we are incrementally merely adding resources to this thing. Even WHO has said that we need to get it under control within 60 days, or we are in uncharted waters. No one EVEN HAS A PLAN what to do (let alone the resources or the will to implement such a plan) if we don’t.

The best plan: AVOID EBOLA. Period. End. Of. Report. We can’t cure it - yes, for individuals that are lucky enough to be caught early enough, modern medicine in a 1st world setting can give them a good chance to recover, but the number of people that this has happened to can be counted on both hands. Also, we can’t innoculate enough people to stop it in its tracks (see the 2nd article, above). Thus, it has to burn itself out (i.e. simply be isolated from the non-infected and kill enough of those in the infected zone that the disease simply runs out of new hosts. YES, that is harsh, but it saves those who are not infected - and that says nothing about doing whatever is humanly possible to help those who are infected. But make no mistake, if this thing grows as it has for another few months, we are sunk - we are talking Black Death kind of percentages OR WORSE.

Oh, and what happens when 30% or more of your nation is sick or dead, and the rest are petrified of getting infected or busy taking care of those who are? Simple: normal functions, like food, fuel and medical production and transport basically cease. Electricity goes out, water stops coming out of the faucet. THAT, by itself, is a recipe for 90% or more of the people to be dead in a few months, without even considering a massive pandemic.

Quarantine - STRICT quarantine - is the only thing that will buy us enough time to work on vaccines and cures. If that means World War Z-like measures, then so be it. We literally face an extinction event if this isn’t controlled SOON.


21 posted on 10/24/2014 12:17:09 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson