but notice they only cite two "experts" without noting what the credentials of these experts were, nor any real evidence backing their claims... and the rest of the information is based on non scientific conspiracy sites.
There have been illegal sterilization programs, for example in Peru, but usually the Human Rights organizations verify such things occurred. Yet they kept quiet here, as did physicians working in the area, who ordinarily will write "letters to the editor" about things like a spike in the rate of miscarriage in these women, Human rights watch usually notes sterlization coercion: example: link
Anti vaccine hysteria is not new: vaccine revolt of 1904.
Therefore an anti-hCG drug wouldn't necessarily have any health effect on the mother directly, it would mainly cause her to develop antibodies which would attack the embryo, which is to say, she would have an immune reaction that counteracts the embryo's hCG and therefore disrupts implantation.
Am I right?
And β-hCG is used in the Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico as a birth control method, am I right?
Now tell me: is there any way to get an effective tetanus shot without the shot being laced with β-hCG? Or is it right that the price of tetanus vaccination would be abortifacient immunity to all your subsequent offspring?
I don't want to misunderstand you with any false assumption, but you seem to write as if early abortions by hormonal disruption are not morally problematic.
From a public health point of view, it would be much better --- would it not? --- to use a Tetanus shot which has no abortifacient side-effects, and a birth control method which is fully reversible, under the control of individual women themselves, without side effects, and not pushed on them by the "motivating" or coercive power of the State?