Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
Ummm, no, the judge is not stupid.

The lawsuit is in Federal Court and the cause of action is based upon someone under the color of state law denying a right protected by the US Constitution.

12 posted on 10/21/2014 7:53:02 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Lucky
The lawsuit is in Federal Court and the cause of action is based upon someone under the color of state law denying a right protected by the US Constitution.

The First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
How does Congress apply to the states via incorporation? Is there some sort of magic transformation that makes the text different when incorporated by the fourteenth amendment? Moreover, how is a restriction clearly upon the government applicable to a private institution? — I know it's a private institution because of other interesting legal discussions regarding rights more explicitly protected. — So, yeah, using the first amendment here is stupid because it sets up precedence on things that are obviously false.
15 posted on 10/21/2014 8:01:40 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson