Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: be-baw

You are correct that it doesn’t mean safe but most of the time the EPA sets their standards quite beyond what is actually safe. I could see testing and informing the community of the dangers but doing a cost benefit analysis from three thousand miles away leaves a lot to be desired. That should be done by the community that will have to pay for it.


36 posted on 10/20/2014 7:25:44 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

I agree with a lot of what you said, except the flow of water either above ground or below does not give much heed to artificial community boundaries. What’s needed for you depends on where you get your water


37 posted on 10/20/2014 7:35:27 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson