Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This deal is Beckal's October surprise.
1 posted on 10/19/2014 6:29:42 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Perdogg

Well, I suppose that Iran will no longer be a threshold state but will bow another nuclear power. Way to go O.


28 posted on 10/19/2014 8:13:17 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Companies doing business with Iran that want sanctions lifted, also nifty trick to make it appear the Obama admin is imposing more sanctions rather than easing them:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3201864/posts


35 posted on 10/19/2014 9:29:00 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

> “...an accord with Iran that would forestall its ability to make a nuclear weapon.”

Forestall?

So says the NY Times.


39 posted on 10/19/2014 9:50:29 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
an accord with Iran that would forestall its ability to make a nuclear weapon.


40 posted on 10/20/2014 2:10:46 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
the Iranians have signaled that they would accept, at least temporarily, a “suspension” of the stringent sanctions that have drastically cut their oil revenues and terminated their banking relationships with the West, according to American and Iranian officials

So many cynics on this thread ... but lookee here: Iran has agreed to accept the suspension of sanctions. What a breathtaking concession. Probably only Obama could have talked them into that. Must've really gone to the mat. He deserves another Nobel Peace Prize.

41 posted on 10/20/2014 3:14:46 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
A leading Republican critic of the negotiations, Senator Mark S. Kirk of Illinois, added, “Congress will not permit the president to unilaterally unravel Iran sanctions that passed the Senate in a 99 to 0 vote,” a reference to the vote in 2010 that imposed what have become the toughest set of sanctions.

But cynicism aside, this is the key. Does anyone know the complete legislative status? A 99-0 vote in the Senate doesn't mean anything unless the House also voted on sanctions, and the President signed a bill. Then there would be a legislative mandate which the president can't simply waive, absent waiver authority in the law. (Not that a law would stop Obama.) But if it was just a sense of the Senate resolution, and the sanctions were imposed by executive discretion under prior existing law, they could presumably also be removed by executive action.

42 posted on 10/20/2014 3:19:03 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

That’s why he’s no making an example of Menendez


45 posted on 03/11/2015 5:57:35 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

bump


46 posted on 03/28/2015 5:14:32 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson