Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith
To evaluate CDC statements, you must see both the science and the politics, and be able to distinguish the relative role of each.

I have not seen Friedan say anything inaccurate about Ebola. Everything he has said is consistent with the scientific literature.

As far as I can tell, he is being criticized for NOT saying all the bilge that people think they know about Ebola as a result of reading The Hot Zone, or Outbreak, or one of the other highly sensationalized but woefully inaccurate dramatizations of a disease outbreak. Plus, he is a horrible public speaker, which does not help.

26 posted on 10/19/2014 12:54:29 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

Are you able to see the political nature of Friedan’s responses?


27 posted on 10/19/2014 4:24:55 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they believed not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
I have not seen Friedan say anything inaccurate about Ebola. Everything he has said is consistent with the scientific literature...

You mean, for example, that you don't have to worry about catching it from public transportation, but that if you have it, you shouldn't be riding public transportation so you don't pass it on?

Or that virtually any hospital with a private room/toilet is capable of handling Ebola cases?

This is a lefty theme...it appeared in the WaPost and the NYTimes.

33 posted on 10/20/2014 12:54:05 PM PDT by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the Republican Party does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson