[Veto!]

Where’s the nutrition? Not a vitamin in sight.

This pale excuse for lunch is LOADED with FAT and very little else. Crackers are very fatty. Processed lunchmeat is very fatty, whatever that horrible white sauce is looks like fat. And the pale cauliflower has had every semblance of a nutrient cooked out of it.

[Milton Miteybad]

This pale excuse for lunch is LOADED with FAT and very little else. Crackers are very fatty. Processed lunchmeat is very fatty, whatever that horrible white sauce is looks like fat. And the pale cauliflower has had every semblance of a nutrient cooked out of it.

While I would agree that the primary source of calories in this lunch would be from fat, I have my doubts that the cauliflower shown in the picture is cooked. Looks like raw cauliflower from where I'm standing.

[grania]

Where's the nutrition?

No fruit, no green or red vegetable, everything but the blah cauliflower would probably find a better home in the chem lab....it's all manufactured processed crap.

The parents have to work with the school's lunch program. A much healthier meal could be provided for the same cost.

[Mr Rogers]

There is nothing wrong with fat. That may be the only good thing about the meal. However, many lunchmeats have almost no fat.