Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why are India's air force planes falling out of the sky?
BBC News ^ | 16 October 2014 | Andrew North

Posted on 10/16/2014 5:21:10 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Are India's ageing air force planes falling out of the sky?

All air forces have accidents, but accounts of Indian warplanes crashing on training flights have become almost routine news.

The latest incident came earlier this week, when a Russian-made Sukhoi-30 crashed in eastern India - both pilots surviving after ejecting for unspecified reasons.

All five crew died in March this year on a training flight in their US-made Hercules transport aircraft.

'Flying coffin' But it is the Russian-made aircraft that form the backbone of the Indian fleet which have been the most accident-prone. The MiG jet in particular has become known as the "flying coffin" or the "widow maker".

Two years ago, India's then defence minister told an astonished parliament that more than half the 872 MiGs it had purchased from Russia had been lost in accidents, at a cost of over 200 lives.

Apparently, pilots regularly complain that some MiG models land too fast and that the design of the window canopy means they can't see the runway properly.

The Indian air force has gradually been retiring the older planes - some dating back to the 1960s.

Yet only this month the air force chief warned the delay in introducing replacements was putting India's security at risk as parts of the fleet were on "their last legs".

Meanwhile, India's regional rival China continues to leap ahead in both spending and firepower.

Indian-designed warplanes have so far not been up to the job. But more than two years since a deal was signed to buy 126 Rafale fighters from France, the bargaining goes on.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospce; iaf; india

Sukhoi 30 planes belonging to India's air force fly in formation with a Globemaster III

1 posted on 10/16/2014 5:21:10 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What is “gravity”, Alex?


2 posted on 10/16/2014 5:23:30 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Feeling fine about the end of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Russian equipment is crap? Who knew. I recall when the Foxbat MiG 25 first appeared and was considered the best military aircraft in the world. Then a defector brought one to us and it had rust on it and would burn up its engines with too much thrust. Message to India: You want the best equipment, get it in America.


3 posted on 10/16/2014 5:31:21 AM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Their civilian aviation system (DGCA) is a corrupt, old boy’s club. I can’t imagine how their military might be.


4 posted on 10/16/2014 5:32:59 AM PDT by Textide (Lord, grant that I may always be right, for thou knowest I am hard to turn. ~ Scotch-Irish prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg505

“Then a defector brought one to us and it had rust on it and would burn up its engines with too much thrust”

Then a couple of years later, they figured out that what they had been laughing at before, allowed the Mig-25 to fly and fight in an nuclear EMP environment.

That led to a years long-delay in the Nightwatch/Air Force One 747 programs, as they were refitted for EMP.

Was Soviet Equipment “junk”?
We’ll yeah, by OUR standards.

By Soviet Standards, where they accepted a much higher threshold of losses than we did, they were good for the missions they were designed for.


5 posted on 10/16/2014 5:42:12 AM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Because they got bad gas at the Quicky Mart.
6 posted on 10/16/2014 5:44:05 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg505
Yes, the best is made in America. Check the Russian accident statistics (if the true ones exist) to see if they have such a miserable record flying the MIGS and Sukhoi aircraft. My suspicion is that the Indian maintenance is not up to par and the pilots are not well trained and lack the proficiency to fly high performance aircraft. This lack can be attributed to the fact that the airplanes are grounded for long periods of time for maintenance. You have to fly a fighter at least 5 times a week to maintain proficiency.

95% of the time you can look to operations and/or maintenance as the cause. The aircraft itself is usually not to blame.

7 posted on 10/16/2014 5:46:39 AM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
An interesting website for all matters defense related in India - Link

It pulls no punches and is surprisingly candid in just what a mess the Indian military is.

8 posted on 10/16/2014 5:49:05 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg505
Message to India: You want the best equipment, get it in America.

Is this still true?

(An honest question since I don't have a clue, but I seem to keep reading scary stories about what China is turning out, and I know for a fact that American companies are increasingly turning to foreign skilled labor because they can't find it America anymore.)

9 posted on 10/16/2014 5:53:05 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Do they (India) have agreement for their pilots and their maintenance crew to train in Russia? Seems to me both obstacles can be fixed.

Then it is the race against time, budget, etc.

10 posted on 10/16/2014 5:53:37 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Nyet...don’t take it personally, comrade, it’s just business.


11 posted on 10/16/2014 5:53:52 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (In Times of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Becomes a Revolutionary Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

The U.S. inspectors laughed at the MiG-25’s vacuum tube radios. They later discovered these were impervious to EMP.

My 1947 radio phonograph is kept running with Russian made vacuum tubes. Don’t last nearly as long as RCAs or Raytheons, though. At least they’re available.


12 posted on 10/16/2014 5:59:43 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("I am a radicalized infidel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BatGuano

Indian pilots do fly a lot. 250+ hours for frontal units as per some sources given that they face two nuclear-armed enemies.

http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?48916-Countries-with-the-highest-flying-hours

Comparing with Russian accident statistics is not exactly a realistic thing. Russian pilots, since the fall of the USSR, have seen a steep fall in flying hours. You don’t fly, you don’t crash!

India’s problems stem from a number of factors: the fact that advanced jet trainers were delayed for two decades, lack of quality spares (caused by the fall of the USSR and breakup of production units there) and a absence of strategic planning at both government and military levels.


13 posted on 10/16/2014 6:32:36 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
By Soviet Standards, where they accepted a much higher threshold of losses than we did, they were good for the missions they were designed for.

that's Soviet philosophy to the tee. Numbers that they can put on the field are meant to out weigh technological advantage cause human life is worthless/cheap and they can field huge numbers of inferior tanks, planes etc. to defeat an army that is technologically superior.

Same as it ever was....same as it ever was.

14 posted on 10/16/2014 7:07:14 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (2 Timothy 4:7 deo duce ferro comitante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Yup. Perhaps similar to the mass production of tanks by the Roosians during WWII; cheap, but effective and can be mass produced quickly. Who needs quality.


15 posted on 10/16/2014 8:45:10 AM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Textide

This sounds to me like the winning answer.


16 posted on 10/16/2014 2:13:21 PM PDT by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson