Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: from occupied ga
Frankly I think the parents should feed their kids NOT the taxpayers.

The whole article is confusing. It doesn't say who is paying for the food. Maybe the parents are. Maybe (probably) it's a free or a reduced-cost program.

And there is no clear reason given as to why the students aren't being allowed second helpings. The article just says left-over food has to be discarded.

10 posted on 10/15/2014 10:27:45 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right
The whole article is confusing. It doesn't say who is paying for the food

In Ga at least its the taxpayers

The Community Eligibility Provision is a 4four-year reimbursement option for eligible, high poverty, local education agencies and schools. Under this provision, a local educational agency may participate for all schools in the local educational agency or only for some schools. Participating local educational agencies must offer free breakfast and lunches for four successive years to all children attending participating schools and receive meal reimbursement based on claiming percentages.
And all you need to do to enroll is say you can't afford lunch for your chile. Free in this instance means the tacxpayers are paying for it. I believe most states have similar programs as established under federal edjumacation guidelines.
11 posted on 10/15/2014 10:38:24 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson