Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
"It is sensible to expect: however the universe came into being, there must be a sane scientific explanation of the process."

It's not necessarily so "sensible" to believe the universe "came into being" in that the majority of atheistic scientists have reverted to Hoyle's old "steady state" theory that the universe is eternal and has always been. The are forced to take this position because any scenario where the universe "begins" would require a God. They can't get around the singularity even under a "multi-verse" construct. To argue otherwise is to discared the elementary logical laws of identity, contradiction and cause and effect. Of course if you are relying on the "steady state" model in an empirical enviorment then you are just using an infinite regression to avoid the conflict and the issue.

14 posted on 10/15/2014 8:02:26 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

Created or big bang, either way you get back to a point where time did not exist we understand it.


15 posted on 10/15/2014 8:10:18 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (You know what, just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson