ICR article image
ICR article image
References
Overbye, D. 2014. Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang’s Smoking Gun. New York Times. Posted on nytimes.com March 17, 2014, accessed March 17, 2014.
Lisle, J. 2003. Light-travel time: a problem for the big bang. Creation. 25 (4): 48-49.
Guth, A. The Inflationary Universe: Alan Guth. Edge. Posted on edge.org November 19, 2002, accessed March 17, 2014.
Cho, Adrian. Doubts Shroud Big Bang Discovery. Science. Posted on sciencemag.org May 19, 2014 accessed May 21, 2014.
Steinhardt, P. 2014. Big Bang blunder bursts the multiverse bubble. Nature. 510 (7503): 9.
Hebert, J. 2013. The Planck Data and the Big Bang. Creation Science Update. Posted on icr.org April 3, 2013, accessed September 24, 2014.
Adam, R. et al. 2014. Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes. Submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysics. Pre-print submitted to arxiv.org on September 19, 2014, accessed September 24, 2014.
Parnell, B. A. Higgs Boson Seems to Prove that the Universe Doesn’t Exist. Forbes.com. Posted on forbes.com June 24, 2014, accessed September 24, 2014.
Hebert, J. 2014. ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence of Inflation? Creation Science Update. Posted on icr.org March 21, 2014, accessed September 24, 2014.
Image credit: ESA/NASA/JPL-Caltech
* Dr. Hebert is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.
Article posted on October 13, 2014.
Let’s trash all the scientists, then wax indignant at any suggestion that it’s “anti-science”.
Your author can’t understand the difference between the Big Bang theory and the Cosmic Inflation theory. The cosmic inflation theory explains only the relatively uniform distribution of galaxies amd galactic-mass objects; many secular physicists have always had a problem with it.
That said, the uniform distribution is currently unexplained, and that drives scientists batty.
That some theories are proven false does not negate the fact that other theories are proven true.
The “cosmic background radiation” remains. Our interpretation of it may not perfectly line up with other age-of-the-universe theories, but it certainly does not come anywhere close to lining up with the “young Earth” theory.
It is sensible to expect: however the universe came into being, there must be a sane scientific explanation of the process. As an engineer, I assure you that my creations are the result of systematic processes adhering to basic rules, where a starting state was crafted and subsequent behavior can be directly traced to that beginning - it did not “hit the ground running” in whatever state you observe it in. Likewise, it is reasonable to expect God created the universe in some starting state, which we can understand best by tracing current states back to that point based on basic principles - and not by assuming it “hit the ground running” in an in-progress form ... to assume so makes the absurd question viable: “so what makes you think God didn’t just create the universe about 20 minutes ago?”
You want a serious, rigorous mathematical proof that Big Bang, Dark Matter, Black Hole, Dark Energy and the rest of it is the result of computer simulation and modeling at the ridiculous end of the spectrum, read the contents of this website by mathematician Stephen J. Crothers:
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/
There has been a deliberate suppression of scientific truth by the community of physicists and astronomers concerning the black hole and the big bang. I bring you free access to original papers in the hope that this fraud can be exposed and physics restored to a rational search for knowledge. The black hole has no foundation in theory whatsoever. Neither Newton’s theory nor Einstein’s theory predict it. In fact, both theories preclude it, contrary to what the relativists claim.
The so-called “Schwarzschild” solution is not due to Karl Schwarzschild at all. The experts have either not read Schwarzschild’s 1916 memoir or have otherwise ignored it. Go here to get Schwarzschild’s original paper, in English. The so-called “Schwarzschild” solution is due to David Hilbert, itself a corruption of a solution first derived by Johannes Droste in May 1916, whose paper has also been buried or ignored at the convenience of the experts. It appears that the experts have not read Hilbert either. Go here to get a copy of Hilbert’s erroneous derivation, in English. Hilbert’s mistake spawned the black hole and the community of theoretical physicists continues to elaborate on this falsehood, with a hostile shouting down of any and all voices challenging them. Schwarzschild’s solution has no black hole, and neither does Droste’s solution. And while you’re at it you might as well go here to get a copy of Marcel Brillouin’s 1923 paper, in English, in which he demonstrates that the black hole is nonsense. Brillouin’s paper has also been ignored.
The experts are always quick to conveniently brand anyone who questions the black hole as a crackpot. Unfortunately for the experts that does not alter the facts. The experts must also include Schwarzschild himself as a crank since his paper invalidates the black hole outright, as does Brillouin’s, and Droste’s. They must also label Einstein a crackpot, because Einstein always rejected the idea of the black hole, asserting in his research papers and other writings that it is not physical, and that singularities in his gravitational field nullify the theory of General Relativity.
It is also commonly held by experts, for example, Hawking and Ellis, Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, S. Chandrasekhar, that the Michell-Laplace dark body is a kind of black hole, and that black holes can be components of binary systems and that black holes can collide nad merge. These claims are patently false. Go here for a copy of G. C. McVittie’s conclusive arguments which invalidate these ridiculous claims. So if you are a scientific person you will read Schwarzschild’s paper, and those of Droste, Hilbert, Brillouin, and McVittie. You have no legitimate excuse not to, as they are given to you herein. This is not a question of historical priority, as the relativist is apt to claim when confronted with reality, but one of fundamental science.
It is also claimed by the very same “experts” that the Universe is expanding. This is patently false.
Also listed below are my own research papers in which I prove that black holes are not consistent with General Relativity.
Here are some important original papers that deal with the Black Hole and the Big Bang. They prove that these theories are invalid.
It’s ALL just theory!
Every time ICR issues another press release like this, another person decides not to be a Christian. Thanks a lot.
As opposed to what? Astrologers?