Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale.

Can someone please explain this line or cite references explaining this ?
Thanks
89 posted on 10/15/2014 4:46:39 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kid Shelleen

It’s spin. The statement is that since these were all old weapons, Bush’s rationale for invading was invalid. Neither one of these is actually true: the article admits that Saddam was actively procuring precursors prior to the invasion, and that was NOT Bush’s rationale for invading in any case.


90 posted on 10/15/2014 4:51:45 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson