Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
To whom would it have seemed that “the government was panicking”? especially versus standing on principle?

To people who understand and follow the Westminster system and British politics in detail, and know what the normal response to such debates is - which is not to dignify them by responding to them.

This vote does matter in a sense - it shows that the Labor Party has a lot of support within it for recognising Palestine as a state. That's significant, because Labor could win government at the next election.

But it doesn't say anything about the stance of the current British government, or about current British policy.

Some in the media - especially those who would like to stir up trouble for David Cameron and his party (for whatever reason) are trying to paint this as more significant than it is. And it's not that hard to do, because most people don't understand the system that well. They hear 'Parliamentary Vote' and think they are all important. A lot of them aren't (Early Day Motions, Adjournments Motions, and Backbench Business among them).

33 posted on 10/13/2014 11:56:55 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975

That’s not an answer. Who would judge the government as “panicking” if they moved to suppress a vote on the state of Palestine?

Letting the Labour Party run amuck bespeaks an abandonment of rule of law. The significance is not lost on Britain’s allies.


34 posted on 10/13/2014 11:59:10 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson