Voting for the greater of two evils is going to give us communism. Everything from the gun rights and to religious freedom are going to be gone if liberals continue to pack the courts with far left judges.
Voting for the lesser of two evils is called self-preservation. Lying is evil but lying is acceptable if it protects innocent people from harm. The same logic applies to voting for less-than-righteous Republicans over Democrats.
Who said anything about voting for the greater of two evils?
Certainly not me because I reject the faulty underlying assertion that there are only two parties; just because I choose to vote Constitution party, or Libertarian, or any other 3rd party does not mean I'm voting for the other party
precisely because there is not other party
.
Everything from the gun rights and to religious freedom are going to be gone if liberals continue to pack the courts with far left judges.
And how is that going to stop if the liberals elected are elected because they have an R next to their name?
Voting for the lesser of two evils is called self-preservation.
No, it's called tacit approval and collusion.
Lying is evil but lying is acceptable if it protects innocent people from harm. The same logic applies to voting for less-than-righteous Republicans over Democrats.
If lying is evil, why was Rahab the Harlot mentioned in Hebrews as commendable?