Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Uh, so far no fusion design has even come close to break even in power, or been able to sustain a fusion reaction for a couple of seconds.
I wish we could have fusion soon but I don’t see it happening short of some huge engineering breakthrough.


7 posted on 10/10/2014 12:42:17 PM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak

Back in the 1970s, my grad school advisor, whose PhD thesis was, at that time, the second most-widely cited paper on a particular aspect of fusion (tokamak blankets), said that one had to have 20-20 vision before we saw a viable fusion plant, by which he meant it would be the year 2020.

While I have not been following developments in fusion technology closely, I don’t think that we are any closer to solving the engineering problems now than we were then.

I don’t see how this design addresses some imposing engineering problems.


14 posted on 10/10/2014 12:51:38 PM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak

Thank you! That’s what I thought when I read this:

“Perhaps the biggest roadblock to adopting fusion energy is that the economics haven’t penciled out.”

Well...that and the fact that it’s never been done.

It’s sort of the Obama concept of “leadership.” Just say something and it will happen.


16 posted on 10/10/2014 12:58:50 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost ("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson