RE:”
Point 2: For strict constructionists, the nonruling allows the culture to sort out the arguments consistent with what clearly are changing social mores. Whether this is good or bad is not up to courts to decide, conservatives might argue, but it beats top-down judicial activism of the type conservatives hate when liberal judges do it. Point 3: The main arguments against permitting same-sex couples to marry are moral and biblical. The problem, especially for conservative Christians who oppose the legalization of gay marriage, is that they are speaking to people who don't accept their moral code, or biblical instruction. They cite Genesis 2:24 “ ???? WTF is Cal Thomas talking about?
Federally appointed judges (mostly Dems) are forcing states to redefine marriage and marry same sex couples.
His arguments make no sense given that.
If social mores are changing then let the states democratic processes do that, not king-judges.
This is a bunch of state by state Roe decisions supported by the SCOTUS. Thomas sounds pro-gay here. Is he gay?