Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JSDude1; originalbuckeye
The bigger question is how do we overrule the courts on issues that should be legislative in nature??

Got a little outside the box thinking here:

Step 1: We win the Senate and House.

Step 2: The (R) run Senate re-establishes the 60 vote filibuster rule.

Step 3: The House defunds entirely -- salary, benefits, retirement for ALL Obama's judicial appointments made under the rule change. All offices of appointees cleared out by GSA.

Step 4: The House votes to limit the authority of judges to rule on issues since the time of Obama's appointment under Harry Reid's rules and effectively voids every decision made by those courts this past year.

Step 5: The House votes to defund the USSC until the USSC reverses its decision not to hear the states appeals of forced faggot marriage.

It you have leadership and guts in the new House, it's easy!

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

87 posted on 10/08/2014 8:17:36 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Agamemnon

The rules of the Senate are not law, and not subject to review.

I am pretty sure your idea to reverse the appointments (or otherwise try to obstruct them) would be deemed unconstitutional. And politically stupid.

We need a Congress that can get stuff done. People are sick of both sides not being able to do anything.


90 posted on 10/08/2014 8:31:17 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson