Deep Ocean Water Temperature did not Rise in Past Decade, says NASA

Main News ^ | Oct 7, 2014 | Felix Balthasar

[dayglored]

A new research has revealed that the deep ocean water temperature has not changed in the past decade.

This study is based on the analysis of satellite data whereby the deep water temperature was measured by researchers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The data analysis largely showed that deep ocean water was immune to global warming.

Global warming has largely affected the temperature of upper Earth in a manner that it is leading to rise in global temperature, but surprisingly the temperature of deep ocean water was found to be unchanged since 2005.

[dayglored]

So while later in the article it says one of the coauthors of the study claimed, "...these findings do not throw suspicion on climate change itself..." -- he has to claim that or he probably loses his funding -- it seems that the claim that the global warming was going into the oceans looks like the pile of desperate crap that it is.

"The agency said that the temperature of the top half of the world's oceans - above the 1.24-mile mark - is still climbing, but not fast enough to account for the stalled air temperatures."

What's next, global warming freaks? Gonna claim it's hiding in the closet?

[Nervous Tick]

>> but >>>surprisingly<<< the temperature of deep ocean water was found to be unchanged since 2005

That “Surprise!!!” BS worked so well to counter the fallout from their false economic theory, so now they’re giving it a whirl on their fake climate pseudoscience.

[Nervous Tick]

>> Gonna claim it’s hiding in the closet?

Don’t give them any ideas! Keep ‘em busy thinking up their own excuses. :-)

[Jet Jaguar]

Bump

[Tea Party Terrorist]

Government Climate Scientists want you to believe that Global Warming has changed the physical laws of nature. Warm water sinks below cold water now.

And if you even question this, you hate science.

[DaiHuy]

No the spin will go something like this. “ this is proof positive that the war on carbon emissions is being won through legislation and regulations limiting the amount of CO2 out put by coal burning and other industrial sources. Now we must work on eliminating fossil fuel use to cut carbon emissions by even more so we can not just stay stable but actually begin to reverse the climate change threat.”

I can just hear the Kenyan saying this at a presser.

[dayglored]

The thermal capacity (how much heat it can hold) of the oceans, especially the deep, dense water of the oceans, is SO much greater than that of the atmosphere (being a thin gas), that in order for heat from the atmosphere to go there and make a difference the atmosphere would practically have to be on fire. So while no one expects the ocean temperature to rise very much as it reaches equilibrium with the atmosphere (which is what the upper ocean is doing), it would be measurable if it was happening.

And it ISN'T HAPPENING.

Hell, if the lower ocean temperatures WERE rising, I'd be more inclined to attribute it to heat from the mantle -- molten rock, anyone, hello?!?!? -- than heat dribbling down from the atmosphere.

[DB]

The Earth’s core must be getting hotter... That’s the only answer left for the “missing” heat...

[tinyowl]

>>Gonna claim it’s hiding in the closet?

No don’t be a Hoterophobe.

[Nervous Tick]

Hatin’ on hotter here!

[VanShuyten]

We’re on the downward side of an inter-glacial period, so I hope this doesn’t total up to some really bad news.

[L,TOWM]

Well, there’s plenty of room of ‘em now that all the gays have come out of it...

[tinyowl]

"Global warming has largely affected the temperature of upper Earth in a manner that it is leading to rise in global temperature,"

Bull f'ing shiite. Take a look at this sentence

1. Warming has largely affected the temperature (?)
2. Of upper Earth (Is this the Hobbit?)
3. In a way (?)
4. That is leading (leading ... we're not there yet, but being 'led' there - it'll surely get hotter one of these days!)
5. To a rise in global temperature.

This sentence makes no sense. A rise in temperature is leading to a change that is a portent to an alteration that may give way to the precursor to a hottingness.

[Spok]

Global warming cultists will turn this into their very own inquisition. There’s already talk of jailing deniers. How long before they’re burning them at the stake? Deniers are the new heretics.

[tinyowl]

"Hatin’ on hotter here!"

That's a Hote Crime ...

... And that won't do, when were a totterin' no hotterin'.

[Paladin2]

I still believe we need to be monitoring the ground temperatures. Air has a low thermal capacity.

[dayglored]

You know what they say: “Hotters gotta Hote!”

[dayglored]

> I still believe we need to be monitoring the ground temperatures. Air has a low thermal capacity.

Yep. The atmosphere doesn't tell us anything of lasting consequence. Go about 10-15 feet straight down into solid ground, in a lot of different places, and wait a good long time, and you'll start to see what's going on.

[3boysdad]

And where would you put those probes? In the center of Manhattan, in an Iwoa corn field, LAX parking lot, New Mexico desert, North Pole, South Pole? What’s the dispersion rate? How many samples should we take? What’s the budget? What will it ultimately mean besides still being just as relative to interpretation?

[Paladin2]

Then we will know if the earf has a fever. Put the probes below the National Labs.