Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Brown signs Martin’s Beach law
San Mateo Daily Journal ^ | October 1, 2014 | Samantha Weigel

Posted on 10/07/2014 5:51:25 PM PDT by Navy Patriot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: rockinqsranch
The weak California Republican party hasn’t put anybody worth voting for in front of the people in quite some time much less put any effort into getting what they do put forth elected.

Well, yeah, but

Jerry Brown therefore is feeling his oats.

The "oats" in Moonbeam's hands have been through the horse,....more than once.

21 posted on 10/07/2014 6:36:27 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Hey I’m not the one saying send in the Marines to chew up a state. By the way I don’t agree with it but I believe that beach access is something that that is required in California and sounds like there was for this property until the after the sale.


22 posted on 10/07/2014 6:38:58 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot; All
"That's not the Marxist way, they don't "buy"...."

Thanks for the correction. =^P

23 posted on 10/07/2014 6:40:10 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Thanks for posting that. That’s pretty much the way I figured it. The guy’s basically being an a$$hole by trying to illegally close a legal, access easement. That sort of thing happens time to time here in Colorado, though mountain access rather than beach access :)


24 posted on 10/07/2014 6:41:34 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

SOP in the Aloha State. If one owns a property that landlocks a beach the owner is required to provide an access path for public use.


25 posted on 10/07/2014 6:47:59 PM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Yup. ;)


26 posted on 10/07/2014 6:52:22 PM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1FreeAmerican

My parents owned a lakefront property in Wisconsin. On the far side of the next door neighbors house was an easement strip down to the lake....the 100 feet of the lakefront was owned by the state...they hed the benefit of lakefront property without the high tax rate for such.....and almost noone ever used the easement!!!


27 posted on 10/07/2014 7:02:19 PM PDT by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Bingo, direct hit. How could a guy with that kind of loot
not see that coming?


28 posted on 10/07/2014 7:02:27 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
“So you’re okay with...”

Don’t even try to put words in my mouth...

It's been my experience, that when somebody responds to a reply and the first word they type is "so", they are always "trying to put words in your mouth".

29 posted on 10/07/2014 7:03:53 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

I agree. The public access law has been in effect since the 1970s. While creating easements took property rights away from the owners then that should have been compensated for, this guy knew those easements were in effect when he bought it. Caveat emptor, pal.


30 posted on 10/07/2014 7:05:02 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

There a few places where beach front property is banned from public use. One of the largest of these is section of beach near Camp Pendleton. Not many places in this country can you pull of the freeway at road side stop and watch a full scale invasion by the Marines. And people restricted from the beaches during the fun and games.


31 posted on 10/07/2014 7:22:19 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (All of the monkeys ain't in the zoo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

As a land surveyor I’ve seen this numerous times.
One example just recently where years ago a couple purchased a large piece of undeveloped land inside of city limits in my county. Before her passing, the mother subdivided her land into 6 lots, one for each child. The new plat given to the land also required ingress and egress thru the subdivision to each lot, as it is illegal to landlock a parcel in my state.

Eventually, one of the lots was sold to a non family member and the buyer began clearing the access easement to his lot. The remaining family members tried very hard to stop this from happening arguing that the subdivision was private land including all easements, but ultimately they were powerless. The access granted (by the original owner)could never be intended for PRIVATE use only, EVEN THOUGH it was at one time private land. The easements created must be given as PUBLIC access to the new lot(s) for future access and development


32 posted on 10/07/2014 8:00:47 PM PDT by snappahead (if your gonna be dumb, you better be tough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

Yeah fun and interesting to watch, however I believe the bases are considered federal not state, just like I wouldn’t try to go on the beach at the Los Al naval Weapons Station.


33 posted on 10/07/2014 8:01:06 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Missed a step or two.

Send the libtard voters back to sh*thole states like
Pennsylvania and the other places they lived before
they stormed our eastern borders. Once we get our
state back some of good Californians chased away
will return and all will be happy.


34 posted on 10/07/2014 8:42:39 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

they are restricted from the landing (beach) area during operations because it is really hard to get all the pink goo out of the treads of the AmTracs after we squash them like bugs.


35 posted on 10/08/2014 12:55:30 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson