Our Constitution is not broken. It is the criminals in DC that are the problem that have corrupted our Constitution by attaching illegal laws and handing the power of Congress over to the fraud in the WH. As long as the people in this country have the right to own and possess fire arms, the people can fix the political criminal issue, if and when they choose to do so. The DC criminals obviously know this so it has become somewhat of a surreptitious race to disarm the people before the people act on the fact that this government has morphed into the enemy of freedom, liberty and justice.
So, do you propose that we resort to violence before we have exhausted all other peaceful avenues (such as an Article V convention)?
I disagree, though only slightly — one aspect in which it is broken is that it does not punish those federal agents (officers, 'agents', employees, representatives, senators, justice, judges, etc) that break the Constitution. (i.e. what happened when it came to light that the NSA was routinely violating the Fourth Amendment? Nothing.) Another area in which it is flawed is that there is no limit on taxation (though the second amendment should, technically, limit the unamended Constitution's taxation power of the Congress). — Plus it will take an Amendment to get rid of Wickard and all the crap that use it as precedent.