Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple singing Peppa Pig tune to toddler 'forced off bus after complaints .... (offended Muslim)
Daily Mail ^

Posted on 10/05/2014 8:13:47 PM PDT by TigerClaws

A couple were thrown off a bus and branded racists after singing the Peppa Pig theme tune to their autistic daughter, it has been claimed. Nick Barnfield and Sarah Cleaves were travelling with their daughter Heidi on a bus from Sheffield to Doncaster when the 15-month-old started crying. The couple, who live in Rotherham, started singing the song in an effort to cheer their daughter up, but say they were branded racists by another passenger and told to get off the bus by its driver. The couple claimed the woman, who they say was wearing a hijab, took offence to the snorting sounds in the song and believed they were a reference to how pork is forbidden in Islam though this has not been confirmed.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2770621/Couple-singing-Peppa-Pig-theme-tune-toddler-daughter-thrown-bus-passenger-accused-racist.html#ixzz3FKa3ULLt Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2014 8:13:47 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

soon you’ll have to convert or die on a bus from Sheffield to Doncaster


2 posted on 10/05/2014 8:16:57 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

O M G

Peppa! Causing trouble!


3 posted on 10/05/2014 8:17:53 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

People who believe in false idols are the most offended.


4 posted on 10/05/2014 8:20:30 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Porky Pig hates Muhammad.


5 posted on 10/05/2014 8:23:36 PM PDT by LeonardFMason (LanceyHoward would AGREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Well, at least they still have their heads attached to their bodies . Never know what can happen when dealing with members of the religion of peace.

I'm sure England will now stop showing Peppa Pig cartoons.

6 posted on 10/05/2014 8:23:45 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Hijabs are offensive — no wearing them on the bus.


7 posted on 10/05/2014 8:28:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Two simple concepts that should be written into law codes everywhere:

1. Do not do provocative things that get others highly offended.

2. Do not be so easily offended at the smallest of provocations.

People are overly sensitive to hurts done to them, but are absolutely tone-deaf when it comes to the grief they impose on others.


8 posted on 10/05/2014 8:33:09 PM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
If this had been posted as satire, I would have denounced it as bad satire.

But it's evidently not satire. Would would (will) happen when some Muslim gets offended because the Queen is not wearing a burka? I suppose the Queen would just put one on.

9 posted on 10/05/2014 8:42:37 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

seems to me that muslims singing songs about pork should be encouraged


10 posted on 10/05/2014 8:44:21 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan

That was definitely a real possibility in the age of cell phones and all.

Not to losing their heads, but being surrounded by a couple dozen Muslims and having the crap beaten out of them.


11 posted on 10/05/2014 8:51:53 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Remind me again, will you, on why we bothered rescuing the United Kingdom from the Nazis in WWII?


12 posted on 10/05/2014 8:53:42 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
I would agree with your second rule, but not the first. it is the right of a free people to be as provocative as they want, as long as the "provocation" does not interfere with the rights of others.

I despise Hitler. But if some fool wants to quietly sing a Nazi song to his child on my bus, he should have the right to do so as long is he is not too loud.

If his song offends me, too bad. It's a free country.

13 posted on 10/05/2014 8:55:03 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Get over it ... the UK has gone over to the mussies.


14 posted on 10/05/2014 9:07:03 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

You were helping British people, not Pakistanis then. Now the Brits are oppressed in their own country by the muslim Pakistanis.


15 posted on 10/05/2014 9:07:44 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel; TigerClaws
Sorry, there is no "right to not be offended". In fact, the U.S. Bill of Rights and other similar documents are specifically to protect offensive speech and print. Non-offensive speed and print DO NOT NEED PROTECTION.

At the point where we grant a "right to not be offended" we have totally lost any semblance of free speech or print.

16 posted on 10/05/2014 10:38:22 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Oops “speed” => “speech”.


17 posted on 10/05/2014 10:39:04 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

“offended Muslims”

Dept. of Redundancy Dept.


18 posted on 10/05/2014 11:19:25 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

btt


19 posted on 10/06/2014 12:37:28 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955

I blame no one but the Brits themselves. They voluntarily brought this on themselves, now they will have to figure a way out of it.


20 posted on 10/06/2014 4:48:54 AM PDT by North Coast Conservative (God created man, Sam Colt made them equal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson