Posted on 10/04/2014 1:48:47 AM PDT by GonzoII
If Sgt Alvin York could have joined the modern Air Force, he would have flown A-10s!
Boots on the ground that flies.
Obama and his Muzzie allies can’t stand the fact that “HOGS” are good at killing MUZZIES!
Love the PEACE sign at the end of the cannon barrel(s).
An A-10 from Battle Creek Air National Guard unit had half of its tail shot off but still made it back to base.
Two pairs of A-10s from Whiteman AFB fly over the Lake of the Ozarks every week.
If the Air Force doesn’t want to keep the Warthog because it isn’t sexy, they should turn the over to the Army. It’s a perfect fit alongside the Apache.
It makes sense but I have been told that the Air Force has tried to do just this but the Army has refused because they don't want to pay for it out of their budgets because they have their own spending priorities.
And yet we can spend just under a billion to buy a hand full of comparably useless Tucano trainers modified as light attack planes.
Warthogs: ugly but well hung
I couldn’t read the text on that sticker, but I know that it said “Peace through superior firepower” :) made me laugh.
Puff’s son? As in AC-47?
If so, sorry Charlie.
The A-10’s Statement of work said that the A-10 was envisioned to replace the A-1E “Sandy” in the Combat SAR mission and provide CAS to SOF Forces. From there they went ahead a developed an extremely capable aircraft that didn’t fir the AF’s image of fast, sleek, and flashy aircraft. But OMG, when it comes to CAS particularly in “danger close” situations!
The 2013 attempt to boneyard the A-10 represents the AF’s third attempt to kill the A-10. IMHO all three attempts are based on re-coloring the A-10s funding line to support an advanced fighter that can do very little to support the Grunt in combat.
The first attempt was in the later 1980’s when the AF wanted to shift funding to F-22. One Chief of Staff and DESERT STORM later the A-10’s death post ponded.
About a decade later the AF tried again. September 11, 2001 stopped that.
Now a little over a decade after their second attempt the AF is trying again. Now ISIS/IS, or what every they are calling themselves, seems to provide a third postponement.
This article clearly identified the AF wants to shift A-10 funding to the F-35 program, again.
When it comes to CAS the grunt wants an aircraft that can stay with him and get down into the mud with him. A support pass every 10 - 15 minutes from 15,000 really doesn’t hack the program.
Good idea. But the USAF would rather destroy it than lose its control over US fixed wing airplanes.
Then again, who wouldn't be having a tough time at that point in the game? Those first days, and all that come after, are what the A-10 was designed for it, with a track record to back it up.
Given that we are using extraordinary machines with extraordinary price tags to shoot extraordinary weapons with extraordinary price tags at relatively low tech, "cheap" targets, that's quite a compliment to the target!
Nice to be made of money or have a printing press for that sort of thing, but I'd like to spend some now to spend less later. You know, "for the children".
Personally, I'd like to see an A-10 makeover and step that bad girl into this century dressed up in all we've learned about modern materials for battlefield survival since the cold war.
Then, you'd have a nice cost effective, down and dirty compliment to the high dollar, fast moving, soft target toys the air force likes so much.
Appreciate your reply
Most A-10’s are not headed to the scrap yard. ANG Units across the Nation deploy them.
Started by a Marine A-6, became a target, then a place to use unexpended ordnance before RTB.
Gonz... Perfect sample of the A-10’s firepower. Us air horse “cats” really appreciate such a powerful asset.
Thanks
Well you beat me but you are correct!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.