To: Kaslin
Seems to me one explanation of the security failure is that the Service, and many others, could care less about this president’s safety.
2 posted on
10/01/2014 5:57:18 AM PDT by
econjack
(I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
To: econjack
I’m wondering how many are stoned while on duty.
4 posted on
10/01/2014 5:58:15 AM PDT by
punknpuss
To: econjack
It would give me hope that this country might survive if SOME agents don’t care about the president’s safety. But I doubt the director fits in that category.
12 posted on
10/01/2014 6:05:12 AM PDT by
VerySadAmerican
(Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
To: econjack
20 posted on
10/01/2014 6:16:14 AM PDT by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: econjack
Secret Service morale is probably lower now than it was when Hillary Flying Buttress was the Queen of Hearts in the WH.
They’re dispirited, get treated like dirt by Moochelle, so why is any of this surprising at all?
30 posted on
10/01/2014 7:09:32 AM PDT by
elcid1970
("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
To: econjack
Seems to me one explanation of the security failure is that the Service, and many others, could care less about this president’s safety. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------//
The only explanation that makes any sense at all. The SS is putting the Obama family out there like pie pans at a shooting gallery. Things must be far, far worse than we're being led to believe. Typical. Can't wait for the tell all books to hit the shelves in 2016.
I keep going back to that State Dept security analyst testifying on Benghazi when he said: " The Taliban is in the wire"
31 posted on
10/01/2014 7:42:07 AM PDT by
atc23
(The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson