1 posted on
09/30/2014 1:43:33 PM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
It’s Vermont. Looney as California.
2 posted on
09/30/2014 1:51:06 PM PDT by
beelzepug
(You can't fix a broken washing machine by washing more expensive clothes in it.)
To: Kaslin
The supposed standard for child custody in family courts is the "best interest of the child." The Vermont supreme court has now extended that to the best interest of the dog.... Previously, a dog was considered property to be allocated like other tangible assets such as a house and car. But this new Vermont precedent declares that the best interest of the dog should be the deciding factor. PFL
3 posted on
09/30/2014 1:53:13 PM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: Kaslin
The more babies Americans murder, the more insane they become about dogs, cats, plants, bugs, etc.
To: Kaslin
This is an example of one of the reasons that I don’t live in Vermont. I love dogs, particularly my dogs, but this is nutty. Dogs are not children. We are not their caregivers or guardians. We are their owners.
5 posted on
09/30/2014 1:58:03 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Kaslin; Joe 6-pack
To: Kaslin
8 posted on
09/30/2014 2:29:48 PM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson