Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

These may be the only F-22’s Achilles’ heels in a dogfight against 4th gen fighter jets
The Aviationist ^ | Dario Leone

Posted on 09/30/2014 8:58:28 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Rich21IE
One of the F-22's vulnerabilities is it's heat signature. In joint exercises, Typhoon has fared well against Raptor, due to it's use of IRST sensors.

Mig-31 does not have IRST, nor is it anywhere as agile as Typhoon, so it would not be expected to be an equal adversary.

The SU-35 and PAK-FA, on the other hand, both employ IRST and are stunningly agile....like "OMG....did you see THAT?????" agile.

However, few of either exist, probably zero are combat operational at this time.

So, no real threat from Russia now, but if those two are produced in quantity be prepared to lose some Raptors.

21 posted on 09/30/2014 9:54:32 AM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise

Can’t argue with that. Survivability killed by “gibmedats”.


22 posted on 09/30/2014 9:55:37 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

The Mig-31 does have an IRST though I’d guess it is more optimised for an anti-bomber/cruise missile role than air superiority.


23 posted on 09/30/2014 10:03:47 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

All these other gen 4 jets mentioned still cannot beat an F-15. And the plane is 40 yers old.


24 posted on 09/30/2014 10:33:19 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Manchuria Called. They want their Candidate Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

My bad, it’s the OLS family.


25 posted on 09/30/2014 10:38:02 AM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu; All
Nice photo.

Here is an assessment of PAK FA/T-50/SU-50 from Dr Carlo Kopp and Peter Goon, Air Power Australia in 2010.

"The available evidence demonstrates at this time that a mature production PAK-FA design has the potential to compete with the F-22A Raptor in VLO performance from key aspects, and will outperform the F-22A Raptor aerodynamically and kinematically. Therefore, from a technological strategy perspective, the PAK-FA renders all legacy US fighter aircraft, and the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, strategically irrelevant and non-viable after the PAK-FA achieves IOC in 2015 (now scheduled 2018)."

"Detailed strategic analysis indicates that the only viable strategic survival strategy now remaining for the United States is to terminate the Joint Strike Fighter program immediately, redirect freed funding to further the F-22 Raptor, and employ variants of the F-22 aircraft as the primary fighter aircraft for all United States and Allied TACAIR needs."

"If the United States does not fundamentally change its planning for the future of tactical air power, the advantage held for decades will be soon lost and American air power will become an artefact of history."

These are very serious guys who know what they are talking about, check out their credentials if you doubt it.

26 posted on 09/30/2014 12:19:40 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise

Lockheed killed their own creation for more money.

Lockheed lobbied against their own F-22 to provide more money for the F-35 because they make more money on those airplanes and the F-35 profits were in danger if the F-22 continued.

I hate Lockheed for this until I die.


27 posted on 09/30/2014 12:30:01 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Adversity does not build character so much as expose it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
If only A.A. Cunningham were still around, he'd post this photo of an F/A-18 with an F-22 in it's pipper. But since he isn't here, I'll do it in his honor:


28 posted on 09/30/2014 1:44:05 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Oh, and here's probably the EA-18G that made the HUD photos:


29 posted on 09/30/2014 1:48:21 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover
No more will ever be built.

All of the tooling was carefully preserved, and manufacturing processes were carefully documented both written and on video, so that the line could be reconstituted in the future if more Raptors were needed or if spare structural elements were needed for repairs.

That said, you're probably right.

30 posted on 09/30/2014 1:53:32 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

How do they stack up to a Mig 35? We are going to need more F-22 in the near future.


31 posted on 09/30/2014 2:48:09 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: laplata
The Germans had better tanks in World War II but we had more. It came down to attrition.

I read a memoir by a German officer (sorry, can't recall author or title now), who had been in an anti-tank unit. He related an incident in which a column of American tanks came around a hill, one by one. His anti-tank guns knocked off each one as it came around the hill. He wrote that he knew the war was lost when his unit ran out of shells before the American unit ran out of tanks.

Yes, quantity has a quality all it's own. However, that's no excuse for fighting the kind of "dumb-rich" wars we tend to fight.

32 posted on 09/30/2014 3:55:50 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (Book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Available from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

Yes, quantity has a quality all it’s own. However, that’s no excuse for fighting the kind of “dumb-rich” wars we tend to fight.


Exactly right.


33 posted on 09/30/2014 4:09:42 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: laplata
We need to build many more.

Exactly — but as another poster said, the F-22 was iced because the F-35 was more profitable… and I would be surprised if the F-35 wasn't planned obsolescence. (After all, how much will the government pay to 'update' the F-35 so that it works?)

34 posted on 09/30/2014 11:04:03 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

We need to build many more.

Exactly — but as another poster said, the F-22 was iced because the F-35 was more profitable… and I would be surprised if the F-35 wasn’t planned obsolescence. (After all, how much will the government pay to ‘update’ the F-35 so that it “works”?)


At the expense of national security. Eisenhower was exactly right about the Military Industrial Complex getting out of hand.

I’m afraid we lose the next major war.


35 posted on 10/01/2014 12:17:06 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

The Suchoi T-50 “PAK-FA” will have L-band radar. That will cause some problems for F-22. The F-35 is only partly stealth for X-band radar and has a hot nose due to bad aerodynamics.


36 posted on 10/02/2014 8:32:58 AM PDT by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson