Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

“And it is the vagueness that bugs me.”
“the destruction of the NBC-requirement would widen their pool of actors to place as President”

If it is vague, then how would clarifying be destroying it?

If McCain and Obama have both run, what precedent are you worried about Senator Cruz setting that is not already in place?

If you claim to want to discuss this, why do you avoid answering my questions and instead chase shiny objects such as calling other posters names and your objections to how searches are conducted?


120 posted on 10/01/2014 8:35:25 AM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: csivils
One thing is crystal clear to all.

The term "natural born Citizen" is a requirement for the Presidency (& Vice-President) post grandfather era.

What does that term mean to you and why would the framers (& other founders) have made that requirement for those that came after them, changing it from "Citizen" initially to "natural born Citizen" during the federal convention after receiving Jays letter?

123 posted on 10/02/2014 4:06:42 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson