Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChildOfThe60s

I should have been more clear.

I was talking about insurance companies declining coverage to those who allow legal guns on their property. It’s is a deal with the devil, as some have pointed out, but the credit card companies who are declining to do business with gun dealers tell me this is a deal that has to be made.

I’m opposed to overriding private property rights, forcing companies to allow guns on their property. The equitable solution to that is to warn those who do prohibit guns that they are, in essence, guaranteeing the safety of those people who do enter. Therefore they can be held responsible if a criminal comes in and injures anyone.


53 posted on 09/30/2014 6:19:44 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Balding_Eagle
I’m opposed to overriding private property rights, forcing companies to allow guns on their property. The equitable solution to that is to warn those who do prohibit guns that they are, in essence, guaranteeing the safety of those people who do enter. Therefore they can be held responsible if a criminal comes in and injures anyone.

I agree with that.

55 posted on 09/30/2014 6:28:03 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson