I should have been more clear.
I was talking about insurance companies declining coverage to those who allow legal guns on their property. It’s is a deal with the devil, as some have pointed out, but the credit card companies who are declining to do business with gun dealers tell me this is a deal that has to be made.
I’m opposed to overriding private property rights, forcing companies to allow guns on their property. The equitable solution to that is to warn those who do prohibit guns that they are, in essence, guaranteeing the safety of those people who do enter. Therefore they can be held responsible if a criminal comes in and injures anyone.
I agree with that.