delenda est....
Posted on 09/29/2014 9:50:01 AM PDT by wagglebee
They really bristle at the work “homosexual”, because it activates a part of the brain so that others know that the subject is about sex, and not just hand holding and color choices. They want us to think that they don’t partake in sexual activities, that they are normal. So while “faggot” still offends them, the one they detest us using to describe them is “homosexual”.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3136556/posts
That's what we keep telling her. Also, the guy got her to quit-claim her share of the house to him (but she's still on the mortgage).
No one is gay. You choose to be gay just as someone chooses to commit adultery which could easily have happened had the guy found a new girl. The guy clearly was able to get off with his wife and father children. Some men I believe use the being gay as an out just like some use transexuality. They are cowards and being gay lets them feel arrogant and get pity concerning their cheating because well its not their fault because they are “gay” as if that is any different than any other bad sexual decision.
I know of a professor who for years had a thing for young ladies in his class and he cheated frequently then that wore off and he found him a young man. He got to stop being the scum bag who cheated on his wife and be a gay man which some how made it his wifes fault and him some kind of sexual liberated hero for screwing up another guys crap hole.
I know I’d be headed straight to my doctor.
Come one waggs...next time give the barf alert!
Thanks for the informative response.
delenda est....
I figured it was obvious from the title.
That’s the key that a lot of people leave out. The attraction isn’t the same as the act. In fact, the fact that a man cheats on his wife is about as justifiable by nature as homosexual behavior, given the fact that I have yet to know a guy attracted to the opposite gender, myself included, who doesn’t find only one person attractive on a spontaneous basis. Just because I find all sorts of ladies attractive, though, doesn’t mean I, or any other man who sees women as attractive, should act it out.
This breaks my heart. When I was working in Mass. as an activist against gays taking over everything there, I helped a woman cope with having her husband suddenly announce he’s gay and gone. Before he finally admitted his problem she would catch him dressing in her clothing. Thank God we did not deal with him taking the kids from her.
The author mentioned that she was totally forgotten from the creation of the children - from motherhood. They refer to heterosexual women as “breeders” and look at them as competition with authority (a legitimate claim to her children) to be defeated. Stripping mothers of their rights and even existence is a central part of the gay marriage/family power game. Motherhood - authority over children and their sexuality = oppression of gay men.
Yea but not till I read the whole article, got nauseated, puked in the trash can I keep by my computer for such purposes did I realize the extent of how disgusting it could be!!
Talk about a Maalox moment!
” Some men I believe use the being gay as an out just like some use transexuality. They are cowards and being gay lets them feel arrogant and get pity concerning their cheating because well its not their fault because they are “gay” as if that is any different than any other bad sexual decision.”
They are just men who have given them selves over to their lust so much that now a woman can no long give them what they desire. Now they have to go to another man who is as lustful as they are. That is what being a homosexual man is all about..lust. The women, kinda different, a lot of them were sexually abuse, raped, some how damaged sometime in their lives and can no long relate to a man. Same thing applies with some men who were sexually abuse as well and it tipped their moral compass. With a lot of men however it is lust.
A great question. Here’s something I wrote years ago:
There is no genetic test or procedure (experimental or otherwise) that can determine one’s sexual orientation. When people claim to be gay and we believe them, what we’re really doing is taking them at their word. We believe their claim, we believe their testimony and we believe their declaration that they are gay.
But there are some people who are suddenly skeptical when one claims to be ex-gay. They don’t believe the ex-gay claim, they don’t believe the ex-gay testimony nor their declaration that they are ex-gay.
When somebody uses a certain standard to measure the credibility of what one group says, but then refuses to use the same standard to measure the credibility of what another group says—thereby ignoring the claims of the second group (ex-gays)—he should ask himself why he believes one group and not the other... This is a double standard.
This is a really sad story that she tells quite well. I admire her strength.
I think you have it right. What makes me angry is its not as if most men don’t have struggles with lust. The idea that one must affirm sexual desires or any desire or else suffer harm is not just anti biblical but anti what I see as simply being a decent human being.
An excellent point.
It dovetails with the logic of disputing a child’s sexual “mis-identity”. Tax-chick (via Mrs. Don-o) made this great point:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3208697/posts?page=21#21
okay--perhaps she is not awful... nevertheless, she ought to have been reprimanded, at least spoken to, about bringing this into work... if they are going to approach you, they should also address her...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.