[OneWingedShark]

You know, it's funny that people who refuse to vote "against someone" are called purists; as if that's at all as comparable to desiring a candidate you can vote for.

In my case the requirements are very few: honor and follow the Constitution, destroy (clean out) corruption, and push for responsible finances.
Is that too much for a candidate? Does that make me a purist?

[Dave W]

Very funny. I actually laughed out loud. I didn't want to abbreviate it as LOL because I wanted you to know I actually did laugh out loud for quite a while.

Well. Your "requirements" are so general almost anyone can win your vote, so I have to assume you voted for Obama in 2008. After all, he was all about following the law, being transparent and cutting our deficit in half. He came across as responsible, an expert on the constitution since he was a constitutional law professor (to this day, I get responses from two different folks, "Well, it must be OK since Obama taught the constitution.")

Try again.