[Don Corleone]

Regardless, as George Will aptly noted, wars are seldom won by airpower alone–and given the caveats Europeans have regarding their own armed forces; it’s save to assume that we will be the ones providing ground troops if and when the time comes.

VEEEETNAM 2.0

[E. Pluribus Unum]

They won't be, because Obola is on the side of ISIL/ISIS/al Qaeda/Taliban.

They are all the same thing. We just have to pretend that Obola vanquished AQ or we are racist.

[logic101.net]

We were recently told that we will be building 3 new bases in the area, to replace the ones Dumbo effectively surrendered to ISIS. I would assume that they would be to house troops....

[Berlin_Freeper]

'We've Got To Kill Them Like Cockroaches'

[PoloSec]

I am opposed to ground troops mainly because obama’s Rules Of Engagement render all efforts ineffective, the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result) continues to be in play.

Either we are all in to win, or we are all out, that’s my position, I desperately would like to stop the persecution of Christians but those same ROE, again stringently limits effectiveness, and may worsen their situation if that is possible.

I do have ideas on how to bring significant relief to Christians, but there is no will to implement such, so I will spare you the details, besides I have already written more words than most are willing to read.

[CodeToad]

There are already troops in Iraq. Obama is a liar and simply will not acknowledge them as “troops”.

[dfwgator]

Better be prepared to stay there for at least twenty years once we go in.

That was the mistake we made last time in Iraq. You break it, you bought it.

[bravo whiskey]

old joke we told in Germany in ‘76. two soviet army generals are sitting in a cafe in Paris. one looks at the other and asks “so who won the air war?”

[depressed in 06]

How many think it will be a disaster with OdumBO leading?