It should be crime to “Not” have more than God himself...
Judging from the responses on this thread, it appears we have solved the puzzle of where all the .22 LR ammo has been going.
No limit whatsoever. If you can afford it and want it so be it. It’s called freedom.
The 2nd Amendment doesn’t “give” anything.
WRONG. Bearing arms is the right of every human being
but it does not limit the amount of ammunition a person can own.
What an ODD transition!
"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Why should there be a limit? Because it would make anti-freedom gun grabbers feel safer knowing that I had only X rounds on hand? 50 rounds could be used to kill 50 people but a shooter can burn through that in just a few minutes of range time. So I would guess that the gun grabber’s optimum number of rounds that they would “allow” gun owners to have is zero.
The BOR doesn’t “give rights”. It merely tells the government what is NOT allowed to do.
Should there be a limit on the amount of free political speech you are permitted to say?
Should there be a limit on how much time you are allowed to exercise your faith and religion?
Should there be a limit on the private use of your home if the government decides it needs to use it to house… ‘migrants’ or government employees?
Should there be a limit on your ability to be free of searches and seizures in this time of ‘insecurity’? I mean we have to be safe from…. potential right wing domestic terrorists.
Should there be a limit on due process - I mean, we are in a crisis and the government just doesn’t have the time and money to afford everyone their day in court. Those resources must be made available for Muslim freedom fighters unjustly imprisoned in Gitmo.
We should limit citizens from jury trials also. I mean, if a cop or government agent makes a charge, then that should be enough to convict.
It’s a waste of manpower and time anyway because we all know if you are charged, you are guilty until proven innocent, unless you are black - whereby because of slavery - they are automatically presumed innocent because we are racists.
We should also limit your right to be free from the government’s ability to imprison those that disagree with policies like Climate Change and other planet-saving agendas. Your existence threatens the planet after all.
We also need to limit any rights that are not granted by government, and that includes making sure States follow all government dictates because individual states, like individual citizens cannot be trusted with anything unless the government says it is okay.
There, I think I cited just about everything that should snowball into an agenda once it is decided that limiting your right to ammo is a precedent that has Constitution legal status.
Yes 0.51%
No 99.49%
One round less than it takes to collapse the shelf they are packed onto.
In my case that was a little less than 12,000 rounds.
But I bought a tougher shelf.
If you can lift all your ammo, you don’t have enough. If you can move it all in three trips, you’re good for the weekend. Unless its deer season.
no limit but once the quesiton is asked....watch.
No.
Next question?
“54-year-old Colleen Hufford,,,,”
Lets ask her family how much ammo an American family should have on hand.
After all, you don't want to crack the slab.
If your home has a crawlspace foundation, perhaps the ammunition stockpile weight is only limited by the actual volume that you can stack ammo crates underneath the house on dry earth. I dunno, because I live pretty far from homes that have crawlspaces and basements. That's the East Coast, mostly.
For a renter of an multi-story apartment, check your rental agreement for how much weight you're allowed per square foot, otherwise you're going to have to use off-site storage.
I hope I've answered everyone's questions.
too much can sink your boat.......
Conservative: more ammo is better, filler up 
“Arms” means firearms. A gun without bullets is a paperweight, not a firearm.
Those who pretend to respect the Second Amendment, while trying to grab ammo or choke off the supply, are just gun-grabbers. Ultimately, the CONSTITUTIONALLY-APPROVED refutation of their position is a bullet to the head.