http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/milton-wolf-greg-orman-111342.html
WOW
So unless this story is bull, Wolfy boy will endorse Orman if Orman “promises” to caucus with the GOP (as if his word means anything)?
After *supposedly* running to Roberts’ right in the primary he would support someone who is unquestionably FAR to Roberts’ left?
Billyboy brings up Dede Scuzzobama, it would be exactly the same thing. RINO backs rat out of spite.
Could it be the little SOB was a just a stalking horse for the rats/RINOs/his cuz Obama all along, a scumbag with a fake “tea party” mask just like Vance McCallister? What a farce.
Let’s have a roll call, all freepers in favor of the pro-fag, pro-abortion, pro-gun control democrat Greg Orman because he’s “not a career politician” and “lives in Kansas”, raise your hand. We have a clown car waiting to take you to DU, where you belong.
Since we have a few fools openly supporting pro-partial birth abortion ,career politician, democrat Princess, Alison Grimes in Kentucky, I guess I shouldn’t be surprised to see they also back “Independent” (LOL) Greg Orman. Cause a friggin lib is much better a Republican who’s “been there too long” right? Disgusting.
Impy, how dare you question Dr. Milton Wolf’s conservative bona fides? I mean, he *said* that he was conservative. The fact that he had no record to back up his words means nothing—all that matters is that he gave speeches in which he claimed to be a conservative and a “Tea Party leader” (for a grassroots movement that, by design, has no leaders, there sure are a lot of self-appointed “Tea Party leaders” come election time). And if Wolf endorses the liberal Democrat over the conservative Republican, why, that’s no indictment of his conservatism, since Pat Roberts “has been in Washington too long” and Kansas needs “new blood” even if he will vote with Obama 95% of the time.
I saw that on Politico. If Orman's smart he'll thank Wolf for his offer but continue with his spiel that he'll caucus with whoever he thinks has the better ideas, blah, blah, blah. I think it's probably a given that he'd prefer to caucus with the Dems but dropping his 'independent' act and ommitting to one side or the other at this point could cost him.