Skip to comments.
Mistakes of the Past Are Back
Townhall.com ^
| September 25, 2014
| Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Posted on 09/25/2014 11:02:47 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
1
posted on
09/25/2014 11:02:47 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
There isn’t a single supposition here that I can definitely refute.
2
posted on
09/25/2014 11:06:40 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Kaslin
What if there were no Islamic fascists terrorizing the world.
3
posted on
09/25/2014 11:08:24 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Kaslin
What if most of the “what ifs” are propaganda by the hate
Bush crowd?
4
posted on
09/25/2014 11:08:42 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: Kaslin
What if radical Islam has declared war on America?
To: skeeter
Nor is there a singe supposition here that can be proved.
6
posted on
09/25/2014 11:11:45 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
(The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
To: Parley Baer
What if there is no radical Islam? What if the face that appears to be sane is simply deception?
7
posted on
09/25/2014 11:12:37 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
(The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
To: Ingtar
Well, Iraq was stable under Hussein and it isn't now.
Kick my ass for saying it but I think its fair to ask whether or not invading was a mistake.
8
posted on
09/25/2014 11:14:53 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Kaslin
First: government NEVER publicly admits to ANY mistakes or failures. The failures are always attributed somewhere else, usually the people who have not provided enough money for government to "fix" the problem. The "problem" never gets fixed and the government never has enough money.
Government is: you take an entity and you take away reason and accountability.
Second, proof of Bush's equivocation for Iraq was the hastily and deeply flawed, basically ignored and rejected "Bush Doctrine" as the reason for invading Iraq.
Dumb.
9
posted on
09/25/2014 11:15:10 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
(The grace of God & freedom always win the debate over unjust law & government in the forum of ideas)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Precisely. None of these issues have been raised by the likely suspects against their god, Obama. Yet, all of the same conditions apply.
What if ridding the world of Hussein was an act of mercy?
10
posted on
09/25/2014 11:15:21 AM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
To: Kaslin
What if this is just a bad article?
To: Kaslin
What if Bill Clinton snatched defeat from the jaws of victory by failing to enforce the terms of the cease-fire which concluded the First Gulf War?
12
posted on
09/25/2014 11:18:29 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: skeeter
No. The mistake was leaving.
It is the Obama doctrine:
Leave a region of the world so that it can destabilize...
13
posted on
09/25/2014 11:19:02 AM PDT
by
Delta Dawn
(Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
To: skeeter
The plan to weaken them and seek the removal of Hussein was made on the assumption that we would remain to stabilize things. It did not account for the Americans withdrawing and leaving a vacuum, as well as arming the more radical elements in the Middle East, creating ISIS and other threats.
14
posted on
09/25/2014 11:20:15 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
(The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
To: Jim Robinson
My father would have been a millionaire if if had not been for that little word if
15
posted on
09/25/2014 11:20:29 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: Parley Baer
16
posted on
09/25/2014 11:21:12 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: <1/1,000,000th%
To many what if questions and no answer
17
posted on
09/25/2014 11:22:56 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: Kaslin
18
posted on
09/25/2014 11:23:32 AM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
To: Ingtar
The possibility/likelyhood of feckless US leadership in the future is part of the problem with the original plan to invade, IMO.
19
posted on
09/25/2014 11:24:46 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: skeeter
Reagan seemed to be able to put the fear into despots without invading their countries. I’m not sure we’ve had a president since that could do the same.
I think that if a number of noted democrats and the media hadn’t sabotaged the war effort and given aid and comfort to the enemy, the war would have had an over all positive effect.
20
posted on
09/25/2014 11:26:44 AM PDT
by
dangerdoc
((this space for rent))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson