To: Responsibility2nd
The question is, would you take him over Elizabeth Warren or the Castro commie?
2 posted on
09/19/2014 12:12:07 PM PDT by
mothball
To: mothball
That is NOT the question.
I can write in any damn name I want to. Or vote third party.
And if your next thought is that I then might as well vote for Liz or Castro; then KMA.
10 posted on
09/19/2014 12:16:16 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: mothball
I won’t ever vote for him. He’s a liberal.
/johnny
To: mothball
At this point what difference does it make! /hil
14 posted on
09/19/2014 12:18:26 PM PDT by
CygnusXI
(Im back!)
To: mothball
Not my choice by a long shot.
16 posted on
09/19/2014 12:19:23 PM PDT by
Uversabound
(Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
To: mothball
That’s not the question, and it may never be the question, unless we all just give up now.
18 posted on
09/19/2014 12:20:00 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: mothball
Which do you think would be more harmful to the American Revolution? A loyalist behind enemy lines or a loyalist commanding patriot troops into battle?
26 posted on
09/19/2014 12:24:46 PM PDT by
dangus
To: mothball
I would vote for Christie against any Democrat and I have, but I hope that manipulative cowardly fat pig does not get the nomination. Nor do I think he is about to regain frontrunner status for anything.
Christie is a total fraud. He has governed by doing deals with corrupt Democrats and he has pushed the budget crisis down the road for everyone to pay later.
28 posted on
09/19/2014 12:25:36 PM PDT by
Williams
To: mothball
31 posted on
09/19/2014 12:27:24 PM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: mothball; Responsibility2nd
The question is, would you take him over Elizabeth Warren or the Castro commie?
No, the correct question is whether or not there is a candidate that represents your principles and morals running for President. There are always more than just a Republican or Democrat running.
You've presented what is defined as a false choice in terms of logic.
34 posted on
09/19/2014 12:28:11 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: mothball
I would hold my nose and vote for him. RINO, though he may be, he is not romney or not a bush; those two I will not vote for.
35 posted on
09/19/2014 12:29:29 PM PDT by
erkelly
To: mothball
To: mothball
“The question is, would you take him over Elizabeth Warren or the Castro commie?”
No. The question is whether we put a moratorium on electing Republicans for the foreseeable future when this traitorous idiot gets blamed for everything bad and wheels and deals with his true pals, the Democrats.
If you think people stayed home with Romney, just watch what happens here.
46 posted on
09/19/2014 1:03:31 PM PDT by
Luke21
To: mothball
The question is, would you take him over Elizabeth Warren or the Castro commie?I think he'd be about a bazillion times better as VP than Joe "Advanced Dementia" Biden! If he can get a conservative Republican elected President -- then I'm all in favor of seeing him running.
53 posted on
09/19/2014 3:45:39 PM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: mothball
Like a card shark, it’s always a forced choice.
56 posted on
09/19/2014 4:44:38 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson