[Responsibility2nd]

All right. Let me boil it down for you.

Do YOU believe the girl was raped? If you were a juror, would you vote “Guilty”?

I honestly don’t believe you would. And that makes you as sick as the school staffers as you all try to “explain” it away.

[a fool in paradise]

If someone attempts to hire a hitman but it was part of a sting to catch the hitman, and the hitman kills the person you called the hit on, are you guilty of conspiracy to commit murder?

[a fool in paradise]

The girl was raped because the expected prevention of said sex act did not occur.

However, she said YES (no means no but yes doesn’t mean yes?). She event communicated to school officials what was happening (which meant that she was uncomfortable and “in her right mind”). They encouraged her to follow through (and they would handle things on their end).

It is difficult to convict someone for a “consensual act” even if the no comes in the middle of the action. This is not a defense of rape. It is a matter of law and the nature of language. Words mean things.

Prosecute the educrats for their roll. What is the criminal charge you would suggest? Delinquency of a minor? Corrupting a minor? Rape? Criminal conspiracy?

[caligatrux]

For the record, there is absolutely no indication that the boy was ever prosecuted for rape. While some of the pleadings indicate that the police were called and a rape investigation was held, I found nothing that indicates the boy was ever charged with or convicted of any crime.

In fact, it appears that the boy kept up his "sexual misconduct" even after the rape:

Boy accused in Sparkman Middle School rape 'bait' incident continued sexual misconduct at school after assault