[Responsibility2nd]

You are wrong on so many levels. Look at the basics.

She was a 14 year old. She is mentally incompetent. She could not consent if she WANTED to.

Based on the facts as presented, was she raped or was it consensual?

[a fool in paradise]

I am not saying that she willingly engaged in sex, but if the set up was her being affirmative, the courts may find it difficult to convict on a rape charge, let alone the issue of entrapment.

[arthurus]

The person(s) who set this up need to be charged with at least accessory to rape.

[caligatrux]

The term "rape" is used by the author of the article because clearly the special needs girl did not want to be sodomized by the boy.

However, nothing in the article suggests there are any charges of rape, or anycriminal charges at all, pending against the boy.

This doesn't look like a criminal case against the boy. It looks like a civil suit against the school.

The only negative thing that appears to have happened to the boy was having the incident listed as "inappropriate touching" in his school discipline record.