To: icwhatudo
In defense of Romney, he had no choice but to stay mute on social issues. With his well-documented track record as governor of Massachusetts, he would have been exposed as a liberal Democrat if he showed his true colors on those issues, or a complete fraud if he made a conservative case on those issues.
5 posted on
09/19/2014 7:45:46 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
To: Alberta's Child
But according to the gope he was the only “electable” candidate we had. He ran like he had both hands tied behind his back and this was the best the consultants and gope could come up with???
28 posted on
09/19/2014 10:34:02 AM PDT by
sarge83
To: Alberta's Child
He exposed himself as a liberal Dem when he announced he was running for president.
48 posted on
09/19/2014 1:43:14 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(Conservatives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
To: Alberta's Child
In defense of Romney, he had no choice but to stay mute on social issues. With his well-documented track record as governor of Massachusetts, he would have been exposed as a liberal Democrat if he showed his true colors on those issues, or a complete fraud if he made a conservative case on those issues. True. If Mittens, Jeb or Fatso want to run for POTUS then they should run as dems.
72 posted on
09/25/2014 3:37:26 AM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson