If an idea is predicated on destroying the Constitution and its Bill of Rights, it's an idea worth destroying. Pure democracy without the checks of a Constitution is the equivalence of two Hollywood liberals and a conservative voting on whether or not the conservative has to see Farenheit 9/11. People who want to establish that precedent are worth fighting against.
What part of ‘Government Shall Make No Law’ do you not understand? You can’t tell people how they should think or vote.