Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homeland Secretary Shows Little Concern Over Open Border Terror Threat
Townhall.com ^ | September 18, 2014 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 09/18/2014 10:01:28 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Pelham

Yes, the chain migration is a silent killer. Five, ten, who knows how many on average can come up because they are related to a new citizen. A man and wife are naturalized, between them there could be fifty people, even more.

If each have five siblings with a spouse and five kids each, that’s seventy people. Then those people can become citizens and do it again. It’s exponential. That is downright frightening.

If the cultures were the same, it would still be a massive problem, but they aren’t. It’s a freakin nation killer.

They want this NAU so bad, they’ll move a massive population base up here illegally to achieve it. “F U citizens, we’ll show you!”

About five to seven years ago, I started referencing the figure at between 20 and 35 million. I think it’s reasoned to reference it at 30 to 50 million now. If California alone doesn’t have ten million, I’d be surprised.

To be honest, I think you’re being too generous to our politicians. I do it too. They know they are swamping this nation. I do believe they have bought into a global plan and are hell bent to see it become a reality.

The NAU is the plan here IMO. We can see how driven the Republican Party is to join this effort. It can’t be on just a whim.

They have consciously sold us out due to a vision there is something better ahead.

No there isn’t.

I know you realize that. You are just like me, wanting to see the best in others. I can’t any longer, and I doubt you can either when it gets down to it.


21 posted on 09/18/2014 1:31:00 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“The NAU is the plan here IMO. We can see how driven the Republican Party is to join this effort. “

Michael Medved has always ridiculed the idea of the North American Union. Judging from that alone it has to be true.

For years he ridiculed the idea that illegal immigration was a problem. Then he dropped that argument completely and immediately said the problem was so big it could only be resolved by another amnesty.

There is no lie too low for the propaganda hacks of the GOPe.


22 posted on 09/18/2014 4:05:46 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I know. I know. I can only listen to the guy for a short period of time before I recognize a Leftist in sheep’s clothing and have to move on.

I know it’s coming because I know Medvid’s core values. He spills them all too often.

I think Medvid is worse than Bush II, but I have the same reaction non the less. I can only listen to Bush for so long. He simply isn’t a Conservative at his core.

His immediate instincts are wrong. His support for an Amnesty (oh yes it is George) is just one issue that reveals him. I know he was in favor of the NAU.

He’s just a limp cloth in the hands of the Leftists. He does more damage to your side, because he appeals to women and they swoon before they think.

OMG, he had some people fooled around here. Nothing the guy did was wrong. He signed on Medicare Part D, which everyone knew was wrong, but the came back was, “Yes, but if he hadn’t done it, the Left would have put in a worse plan.”

How about no plan!!!!

I think Medvid fills the void of folks who are enamored with the Media, but want to think of themselves as Conservatives. He lures them in and they never progress further, thinking themselves to have arrived at Conservatism central, not too Right and not too Left.

Sadly, Medvid is Left. He’s what I’d call a more moderate Left, but he’s position just right to lead a lot of people off track.

He really appeals to the folks who buy into the idea the Tea Party members are radical right. Now he may not believe that, to be fair to him. I still think that pretty much describes how he thinks and operates. I’ve seen him go against the Conservative grain so many times.

At least IMO, that’s the gap I see him filling.

Nice talking to you again.


23 posted on 09/18/2014 7:58:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“I think Medvid is worse than Bush II, but I have the same reaction non the less.”

I’m of the opinion that Medved was a lot more closely associated with Dubya than he lets on publicly. I think he was either a part time speech writer or at least part of an informal group that met periodically with him.

Dubya’s second inaugural is filled with the sort of utopian liberal internationalism that you hear from Medved. They both advocate illegal alien amnesty. They’re at the core moderate liberals who pose as conservatives.

“Sadly, Medvid is Left. He’s what I’d call a more moderate Left, but he’s position just right to lead a lot of people off track.”

If you know Medved’s history he began his political life on the Left. Mr Support the Troops was anything but. During Vietnam he was giving aid and comfort to the enemy. He once worked as an aide to Ron Dellums, the Castroite Democrat from the Bay area. There was no one in Congress to the left of Red Ron Dellums.

Medved started moving away from the hard Left when Nixon bailed Israel out in the 1973 war. Medved wasn’t interested in saving the Vietnamese people from a Communist hell, but the idea of saving his own people from slaughter got his attention. While it’s nice that he no longer sides with America’s enemies I don’t like having him try to remake the conservative movement to suit his preferences, which still show plenty of affinity for liberalism.


24 posted on 09/18/2014 9:14:28 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I appreciate the comments very much.

I wouldn’t be surprised if he was a confidant of Bush II. They could easily be fellow travelers in my estimation.

As for Dellums, I can’t picture him any longer, but I remember the name very well. I also remember that he was a card carrying uber Leftist. He was black wasn’t he? I seem to remember him being of the ilk to game every issue he could on race.

Okay, I just looked him up. He was black, and I remember his face very well.

Here’s one article I stumbled across. It verifies your impression of him.

http://www.knology.net/~bilrum/dellums.htm

So Medvid was in his camp? Wow. That’ll leave a mark!

My problem with the Vietnam War wasn’t that we decided to go in. It was that we didn’t decide to win it.

We should have kicked the livin’ snot out of Hanoi until it begged us for peace. Instead we allowed our troops to get picked off for years.

That’s what angered me then, and still does today.

When our troops came home, the treatment they received..., whew that drove me bananas.


25 posted on 09/18/2014 9:53:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson