1 posted on
09/18/2014 7:23:24 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Gosh, I hope not......she’s been great for recruiting and promotion of conservatism.
2 posted on
09/18/2014 7:25:28 AM PDT by
Politically Correct
(A member of the rabble in good standing)
To: Kaslin
Leave her alone, she’s doing a hell of a job.
3 posted on
09/18/2014 7:25:53 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
To: Kaslin
They wont do anything until after the November 4th election. When that is over she will resign her DNC job to “spend more time on her legislative and family duties”.
To: Kaslin
DWS to DWTS next season?...............
5 posted on
09/18/2014 7:29:39 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: Kaslin
"... they are grabbing us by the hair and pulling us back. "
Looks to be difficult to get a good purchase on DWS using her hair.
6 posted on
09/18/2014 7:30:10 AM PDT by
Paladin2
Some pics of Blabbermouth Schultz
7 posted on
09/18/2014 7:32:38 AM PDT by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: Kaslin
When the DEMS were on top, she was their media-darling, loved and repeated everything vomited from her mouth.
11 posted on
09/18/2014 7:40:24 AM PDT by
Toespi
To: Kaslin
To: Kaslin
If Chelsea Clinton took her place, would anyone notice?
13 posted on
09/18/2014 8:07:00 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Kaslin
If I didn’t think she actually believed every extremist thing that escapes her pie hole, I would think she was a GOP plant to make people leave the Demonrat Party.
15 posted on
09/18/2014 8:34:43 AM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
To: Kaslin
My guess is... if they want to fire her ...it is because she isn’t stupid “enough”!!
17 posted on
09/18/2014 8:52:59 AM PDT by
ontap
To: Kaslin
19 posted on
09/18/2014 10:33:26 AM PDT by
upchuck
(It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care.)
To: Kaslin
The headline should be
WILL THE DNC GIVE DWS THE BACK OF THEIR HAND?
20 posted on
09/18/2014 10:42:27 AM PDT by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Kaslin
Don't be surprised if DWS loses her job for making Democrats and President Obama look bad... As much as I dislike her, I have to say that Barack Obama did not need Debbie Wasserman-Schultz to make him look bad.
21 posted on
09/18/2014 11:36:51 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: Kaslin
The Dems will need a fall guy for the upcoming bad election results.
She will be their reason that Dems lose seats, Despite having the messiah in charge.
23 posted on
09/18/2014 11:49:31 AM PDT by
BeauBo
To: Kaslin
"Now, it looks like Democrats have had enough of DWS' hyperbolic, dramatic and unhelpful approach to taking on Republicans.""The perception of critics is that Wasserman Schultz spends more energy tending to her own political ambitions than helping Democrats win."
Of the two statements, the second one seems to be far more likely to have gotten her in trouble. "Hyperbolic" and "dramatic" are the democrats' stock-in-trade.
26 posted on
09/18/2014 3:17:19 PM PDT by
Flag_This
(You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
