Extensive and informative article from an expert.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: No One Special
Just “Shock and Awe” Ebola.
2 posted on
09/17/2014 2:20:58 PM PDT by
EEGator
To: No One Special
Nuke it from space, it’s the only way to be sure.
3 posted on
09/17/2014 2:26:20 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
((this space for rent))
To: No One Special
pRes_ _ent Obola is intent on establishing an aerial
gateway for the disease to all states, in case
the tuberculosis, IS, or EV-68 don’t finish the job first.
4 posted on
09/17/2014 2:26:37 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
To: No One Special
5 posted on
09/17/2014 2:26:53 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: No One Special
And if the outbreak is not stopped now, we could be looking at hundreds of thousands of people infected, with profound political and economic and security implications for me. So this is an epidemic that is not just a threat to regional security — it’s a potential threat to my security....”
6 posted on
09/17/2014 2:27:22 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: No One Special
My guess is it may degrade and wear down our military.
Enough is enough!
These are soldiers, military personnel, not medical personnel or aid workers! Use the right tools for the appropriate jobs.
7 posted on
09/17/2014 2:28:19 PM PDT by
nomad
To: No One Special
Who is going to protect the troops while they are working to stop Ebola?
8 posted on
09/17/2014 2:28:34 PM PDT by
Slyfox
(Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
To: No One Special
I wonder how many of these 3,000 will become infected? And, what will be the government's response to them when they return home? How long will they have to wait for treatment?
This is not how we should use our military personnel. Boots on the ground to fight the ebola virus. Air strikes against the dreaded ebolas. Why didn't we try sanctions first?
9 posted on
09/17/2014 2:29:35 PM PDT by
good1
(Valiant for the Truth)
To: No One Special
They can if they follow this Marine's plan.
11 posted on
09/17/2014 2:30:59 PM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: No One Special
12 posted on
09/17/2014 2:31:20 PM PDT by
wtd
To: No One Special
I’m still skeptical about involving the U.S. military in this.
To: No One Special
They’ll have to go back to a .30 caliber battle rifle first. .223 is not adequate for fighting Ebolas.
To: No One Special
I’d think this would be the perfect opportunity for the older Obama daughter to do some mission/outreach work. Let an Obama go personally to the Ebola-infected nations to work beside U.S. troops.
15 posted on
09/17/2014 2:33:44 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: No One Special
We have more “boots on the ground” in West Africa than Iraq.
16 posted on
09/17/2014 2:33:55 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Clinton / Bush 2016?)
To: No One Special
To: No One Special
The first good article on this operation that I have seen.
23 posted on
09/17/2014 2:41:51 PM PDT by
ansel12
To: No One Special
Methinks someone has created a hockey-stick graph of the projected ebola outbreak to stimulate massive funding for this “war”.
35 posted on
09/17/2014 3:10:05 PM PDT by
Nachoman
(libertyarmstx.com is now open!)
To: No One Special
Can the U.S. Army Degrade and Destroy Ebola? Well....yes.... if that is what you want.... But are you sure you want that?
Beware what you ask for.
42 posted on
09/17/2014 3:30:30 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
To: No One Special
We tried meals on wheels in Somalia. Somalia’s welcome wagon kicked our butt.
46 posted on
09/17/2014 3:41:36 PM PDT by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: No One Special
Don't agree with the view put forth in the article that airlines are wrong in limiting flights. To the contrary, the airlines are right in limiting travel to and from those countries. How do you think the virus is spreading, after all? If anything, it is irresponsible not to essentially quarantine those countries. Doing this and fighting the virus aren't exclusive of one another, deliveries of needed supplies can still be made via non-commercial air transport.
47 posted on
09/17/2014 3:45:41 PM PDT by
Major Matt Mason
("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson