You shouldn’t turn it off. This will build the foundation for the rest of the hearings. Of course, it is more interesting to me because I have know the people involved having worked with them.
And my hope and prayer is that Gowdy views "winning" in terms of getting the truth out, as much as that is possible in dealing with the Obama "regime".
This may not be a fireworks show, yet...but Gowdy is a prosecutor. He will patiently build his case brick by brick. It will seem boring and harmless, but when he is ready he will hit them like a Sidewinder. And by then they will have no defense they will have proven their own guilt. If I was on trial and he was the prosecutor, I’d be pleading out. He plays no favorites, and I have the impression he is fearless and doesn’t give a hoot what the leadership thinks. If he has the proof, I would expect him to put Bullethead at the witness table. As much as it pains me, I have to be patient.
Been watching. I think it’s a good first step/hearing - the Dems are involved in questioning, not grandstanding and even old Cummings was pretty good (all things considered) in wanting to assure this doesn’t happen again. Duckworth is actually doing a pretty good job questioning. Gowdy has taken the “circus” aspect out of this - committee on good behavior. I also think that when you see whatsteps have been necessary since Benghazi to improve the security for our people abroad, it draws a good contract to conditions as they existed during Benghazi and what was not happening, but should have been.