To: sukhoi-30mki
Low frequency = low resolution and big antennas.
A bigger threat would be bistatic radars and using external signals like TV or cell towers as the signal source. A lot of stealth is focused on reflecting a radar pulse in any direction but the one from which it came. Separate the transmitter and receiver and you have break that.
6 posted on
09/16/2014 12:52:17 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
To: KarlInOhio
Multiple triangulations in real-time will kill any advantage stealthy designs might have.................
8 posted on
09/16/2014 12:56:35 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: KarlInOhio
The problem with bistatic is that it is even easier to spoof.
9 posted on
09/16/2014 12:57:46 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: KarlInOhio
A stealth object swimming through an ocean of cell phone and TV RF creates a moving dead spot. The clutter steady state is disrupted.
10 posted on
09/16/2014 12:59:02 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: KarlInOhio
A bigger threat would be bistatic radars and using external signals like TV or cell towers as the signal source. An unnamed country in the Far East has been working very hard on just what you speak of for some time.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson