Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Hillary Clinton would be nothing if she were not married to Bill Clinton.

She has achieved nothing in life on her own.

Women’s groups are supposedly so excited about hillary being the first woman president and all that.

What does it say about these groups, and feminism, that the first woman president may well be someone who is only there because of who she was married to? Someone who stayed in a bad marriage for unknown reasons? Feminism tells us that women are not to put up with infidelity and other bad behavior from a man. Yet Hillary is allegedly such a strong woman, yet was a lapdog and doormat in her marriage. How do we reconcile all these contradictions?


5 posted on 09/16/2014 8:05:01 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego
Hillary Clinton would be nothing if she were not married to Bill Clinton.

She married him and she's still nothing.................

6 posted on 09/16/2014 8:07:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

When asked what her life would be like if she’d married the mechanic that was her highschool sweetheart instead of Bill,

she said it wouldn’t be any different because that guy would have been president instead of Bill.


7 posted on 09/16/2014 8:09:22 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson