To: Fenhalls555
If Bangladesh can be an independent country, why not Scotland?
3 posted on
09/16/2014 4:56:56 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
To: Cowboy Bob
If Bangladesh can be an independent country, why not Scotland? Don't forget Haiti.
4 posted on
09/16/2014 5:00:57 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: Cowboy Bob
To: Cowboy Bob
Don’t forget Pakistan!
Bangladesh and Pakistan were Muzzie nations carved out of India with major population transfers.
11 posted on
09/16/2014 5:28:21 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Cowboy Bob
Who would be their protectors if they became independent?
20 posted on
09/16/2014 6:22:57 AM PDT by
angcat
To: Cowboy Bob
UK is four separate countries united as a result of a concept of aristocratic entitlement. The concept of monarchy as a ruling system is long past.
30 posted on
09/16/2014 7:20:37 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Cowboy Bob; SampleMan
Lay off the cheap shots.
Scotland (and I am a NO voter btw) is a great country, which has produced an amazing amount of great men and women, inventions, culture, science, sport, literature.....
Do not compare us to third world countries.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson